[2006] KEHC 3161 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had been granted enlargement of time and stay of execution on clear conditions, including payment of filing fees and deposit of the judgment sum within 10 days. The applicant failed to comply within the stipulated period, causing the leave and stay to lapse and become inoperative....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KEHC 3161 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: City Council of Nairobi; Respondent: Judith A. Guserwa
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 1268 of 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Enlargement of Time and Stay of Execution
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- JL Osiemo
- Legal Topics
- Enlargement of Time, Stay of Execution, Non Compliance With Court Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
City Council of Nairobi
Applicant
Judith A. Guserwa
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Enlargement of Time and Stay of Execution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted further enlargement of time to comply with the court's previous conditional orders.
- 2 Whether failure to comply with the conditions for stay of execution and enlargement of time renders the previous leave inoperative.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had been granted enlargement of time and stay of execution on clear conditions, including payment of filing fees and deposit of the judgment sum within 10 days. The applicant failed to comply within the stipulated period, causing the leave and stay to lapse and become inoperative. The court held that allowing further enlargement of time after such non-compliance would undermine the finality of court orders and amount to an abuse of process. Consequently, the application for further enlargement of time was dismissed, and the respondent was granted liberty to execute the decree.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The applicant's application for enlargement of time is dismissed.
- The plaintiff is at liberty to execute the decree.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
Misc. Appli. 1268 of 2005
CITY COUNCIL OF NAIROBI……………………............................……………………APPLICANT
VERSUS
JUDITH A. GUSERWA………………………………........................……………….RESPONDENT
RULING
By a Chamber Summon dated 24th August 2005 and filed the same day, the applicant sought the following orders among others:
1. That there be stay of execution of the judgment decree and all consequential orders in NAIROBICMCC NO.3881 OF 2002 (JUDITH GUSERWA VS NAIROBI CITY COUNCIL) pending the hearing and determination of the intended Appeal or further orders of the court.
2. That there be enlargement of time to enable the Applicant institute Appeal against the Respondent arising from the judgment and decree of NAIROBI CMCC NO.3881 OF 2002 dated 9th September 2004.
3. That the Draft Memorandum of Appeal annexed to the present Application and marked “MNM” be deemed duly filed upon payment of requisite court fees.
That application was filed about one year after the judgment was delivered. The application was heard by Kubo, J who granted the same on the following conditions:
(1) Stay of execution of the judgment in NAIROBICMCC NO. 3881 OF 2002 pending the filing and hearing and determining of the intended Appeal.
(2) Time to file appeal enlarged and the Draft Memorandum of Appeal marked MNM annexed to the application be deemed duly filed upon payment by the applicant herein of the requisite court filing fees which must be paid within 10 days.
(3) Additionally the applicant herein shall deposit also within 10 days the Shs.516,664/= presenting the judgment sum plus costs and interest as at 25th October 2005 in an interest earning account to be operated jointly by the advocates for the applicant and respondent pending the outcome of the appeal.
The applicant failed to comply with the above conditions within the time ordered by the court. The period of the order expired on 6th November 2005. By Notice of Motion dated 2nd December 2005 but filed on 5th December 2005 the applicant again seeks the enlargement of time for such period as the Honourable court deems expedient to enable the Applicant comply with the order made on 27th October 2005.
The application is opposed by the respondent on the ground that judgment was delivered on 9th September 2004 and all along the applicant did nothing until the time the respondent was in the process of execution and that is the time the applicant rushed to court. They were granted enlargement of time but on certain conditions which they failed to comply with. For the applicants again to be heard to seek enlargement of time amounts to abuse of the court process.
The applicant’s application was granted on certain conditions and within a given time. Once the applicant failed to comply with those conditions within that given time, that leave lapsed and became inoperative after the 10 days condition granted by the court.
The applicant’s application is dismissed.
The plaintiff is at liberty to execute the decree.
The applicant will bear the costs of this application.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 23rd day of February 2006.
J.L.A. OSIEMO
JUDGE