[2015] KEHC 3636 (KLR)
The court found that there was no evidence to support the respondent's claim that the applicant's vehicles were towed to Dagoretti or that the applicant was served with an invoice for impounding fees. The court held that the Nairobi County askaris exceeded their mandate by impounding the vehicles without following...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 3636 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: City Star Shuttle Ltd; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision 226 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling
- Outcome
- application allowed in part
- Judges
- AW Macharia
- Legal Topics
- Impounding of Motor Vehicles, Traffic Offences, County by Laws, Procedural Fairness
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
City Star Shuttle Ltd
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the impounding of the applicant's motor vehicles by Nairobi County askaris was lawful.
- 2 Whether the applicant was properly served with an invoice for impounding fees.
- 3 Whether the demand for impounding fees was based on evidence and legality.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there was no evidence to support the respondent's claim that the applicant's vehicles were towed to Dagoretti or that the applicant was served with an invoice for impounding fees. The court held that the Nairobi County askaris exceeded their mandate by impounding the vehicles without following the proper legal procedure, which would have required arresting and charging the drivers or owners for obstruction. The demand for impounding fees was therefore based on an illegality. The court concluded that the application was merited and ordered the unconditional release of the remaining impounded vehicles to the applicant.
Court Disposition
application allowed in part
Orders
- Motor vehicles KBT 708 H and KBX 130 K to be unconditionally released to the applicant.
- No orders regarding motor vehicle KBS 897 T as it was already released upon payment of fees.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CRIMINAL REVISION NO.226 OF 2015
CITY STAR SHUTTLE LTD……………..………………….......….APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC ………………………………..……………………..RESPONDENT
RULING
By Notice of Motion dated 24th June, 2015 the applicant prays for the release of its motor vehicles registration Number KBT 708 H, KBX 130 K and KBS 897 T which were impounded by the 1st respondent.
According to the applicant, the drivers of the said motor vehicles were ordered to drive the vehicles to the Nairobi County parking bay in Dagoretti by the County asksaris. In a Replying Affidavit sworn by Reginah Irimu, Assistant Director in the Department of city Inspectorate in Nairobi County on 14th July, 2015, the vehicles were towed to the parking bay after their drivers abandoned them at a non designated bus stage thus causing obstruction to other road users. It is deponed that the vehicles were parked near Pan Afric Hotel along Valley Road on the 15th June, 2015. It is deponed that the 1st respondent is only holding motor vehicles registration Nos. KBT 708 H and KBX 130 X and that motor vehicle KBS 897 T was released to the applicant upon payment of impounding fees. They have asked the applicant to pay the impounding fees upon which the vehicles would be released to it.
After considering the various submissions made by the respective parties, I note that there is no evidence that the applicant’s motor vehicles were towed to Dagoretti. The mere presence of a chain on the ground as exhibited on annexture ‘RI 1’ to the Replying Affidavit cannot suffice as evidence of towing. Annexture RI 1 are also not sufficient in demonstrating that the vehicles were parked in non-designated bus stage prior to their impounding. Even assuming that the vehicles were causing obstruction, as conceded by the 1st respondent’s counsel, the Nairobi County Government has By-Laws governing traffic movements within the city. The proper thing that ought to have been was to arrest the drivers and have them charged with obstruction. If the drivers opted to flee, the motor vehicles’ owners ought to have been sought and charged accordingly.
On the issue of impounding fees, as conceded by counsel for the 1st respondent the rule of the law ought to be adhered to in charging them. As at the time this application was heard, there was no evidence shown that the applicant had been served with an invoice demanding payment of particular fees and it failed to do so. Hence, the assertion by the 1st respondent that the applicant has adamantly failed to pay the said impounding fees is based on no evidence.
But again, as I have noted, there is no evidence that the applicant’s motor vehicles were towed to Dagoretti hence any impounding fees demanded is based on an illegality.
It is my view that the County of Nairobi askaris exceeded their mandate in impounding the vehicles. They ought to have followed the right procedure of dealing with traffic offenders. I accordingly find that the application is merited. I order that motor vehicles KBT 708 H and KBX 130 K be unconditionally released to the applicant. As for motor vehicle registration KBS 897 T there is evidence that the same was released to the applicant on 15th June, 2015 upon payment of some fees to the County Government. The receipt issued thereof shows the vehicle was collected on the same date by the applicant. I thus make no orders regarding this vehicle.
DATED and DELIVERED this 20thJULY, 2015.
G. W. NGENYE – MACHARIA
JUDGE
In the presence of:-
1. Mr. Mburu for the applicant.
2. M/S Aluda for the 2nd Respondent and the 1st respondent.