Claudia Nekesa Wafula v Cosmos Sacco Society Ltd

Claudia Nekesa Wafula v Cosmos Sacco Society Ltd

The Claimant proved on a balance of probability that she withdrew from the Sacco, sought refund of her savings, and the Respondent neither denied the debt with evidence nor showed any outstanding loan or guarantee liability; accordingly, the Respondent was liable to refund Kshs. 547,325 with costs and interest.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KECOPT 344 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: CLAUDIA NEKESA WAFULA; Respondent: COSMOS SACCO SOCIETY LTD
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case E439 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Co Operative Tribunal Claim for Refund of Member Savings/deposit / Judgment After Written Submissions; Respondent Absent/no Submissions
Outcome
Claim allowed in full
Judges
["J Mwatsama", "B Sawe", "F Lotuiya", "PO Aol", "M Chesikaw"]
Legal Topics
Refund of Member Deposits, Withdrawal/resignation From Sacco, Prematurity of Claim, Costs and Interest, Technicalities of Procedure
Source Language
en
Co Operative Law Sacco Law Civil Procedure Refund of Member Deposits Withdrawal/resignation From Sacco Prematurity of Claim Costs and Interest Technicalities of Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

CLAUDIA NEKESA WAFULA

Claimant

COSMOS SACCO SOCIETY LTD

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Co Operative Tribunal Claim for Refund of Member Savings/deposit / Judgment After Written Submissions; Respondent Absent/no Submissions

  1. 1 Whether the Claimant established a proper basis for an order compelling refund of her savings
  2. 2 Who should bear the costs of the claim

Ratio Decidendi

The Claimant proved on a balance of probability that she withdrew from the Sacco, sought refund of her savings, and the Respondent neither denied the debt with evidence nor showed any outstanding loan or guarantee liability; accordingly, the Respondent was liable to refund Kshs. 547,325 with costs and interest.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed in full

Orders

  • Judgment entered for the Claimant against the Respondent for Kshs. 547,325
  • Costs awarded to the Claimant