[2018] KEELRC 1911 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 1911 (KLR)

The court found that the Claimant voluntarily resigned from employment, as evidenced by his undisputed resignation letter, and therefore the claim for unlawful termination was without basis and dismissed. However, the Respondent failed to produce documentary evidence of payment of the Claimant’s terminal dues,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 1911 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Clement Kazungu Philip; Respondent: ARM Cement (formerly known as Athi River Mining Ltd)
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 65 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the claimant in part
Judges
L Ndolo
Legal Topics
Unlawful Termination, Voluntary Resignation, Terminal Dues, Severance Pay, Leave Entitlement
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unlawful Termination Voluntary Resignation Terminal Dues Severance Pay Leave Entitlement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Clement Kazungu Philip

Claimant

ARM Cement (formerly known as Athi River Mining Ltd)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Claimant has proved a case for unlawful and unfair termination of employment.
  2. 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to the remedies sought.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Claimant voluntarily resigned from employment, as evidenced by his undisputed resignation letter, and therefore the claim for unlawful termination was without basis and dismissed. However, the Respondent failed to produce documentary evidence of payment of the Claimant’s terminal dues, including leave pay for 46 days, severance pay for 20 years, salary for 22 days, overtime, travelling allowance, baggage allowance, and one month’s salary in lieu of notice. The court held that these dues were therefore payable to the Claimant, except for the claim for public holidays, which was not proved and dismissed. The court entered judgment in favour of the Claimant for the...

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant in part

Orders

  • Judgment entered in favour of the Claimant for KES 471,201.
  • Amount to attract interest at court rates from the date of judgment until payment in full.