[2009] KEHC 350 (KLR)

[2009] KEHC 350 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had proved purchase of the disputed plot, obtained the necessary Land Control Board consent, and had been in occupation since 1973. The defendant acquired the property through succession, but the plaintiff's interest as a purchaser and creditor was not extinguished by the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2009] KEHC 350 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Clement Kongo Amukati; Defendant: Difina Ituku Buleti
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 24 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim allowed; registration of original plot cancelled and new titles to be issued as ordered.
Legal Topics
Land Sale Agreements, Title Registration, Succession and Inheritance, Land Control Board Consent
Source Language
en
Land and Property Land Sale Agreements Title Registration Succession and Inheritance Land Control Board Consent

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Clement Kongo Amukati

Plaintiff

Difina Ituku Buleti

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to ownership of Plot No. ISUKHA/SHISWA/1073 based on a sale agreement with the deceased owner.
  2. 2 Whether the defendant's registration as proprietor through succession extinguished the plaintiff's interest in the property.
  3. 3 Whether the subdivision and registration process was properly conducted and consented to by the Land Control Board.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had proved purchase of the disputed plot, obtained the necessary Land Control Board consent, and had been in occupation since 1973. The defendant acquired the property through succession, but the plaintiff's interest as a purchaser and creditor was not extinguished by the succession process. The court held that the plaintiff's interest must be recognized, and ordered cancellation of the current registration, subdivision of the original plot, and registration of the plaintiff as proprietor of Plot No. ISUKHA/SHISWA/1073. The defendant was to be registered as proprietor of Plot No. ISUKHA/SHISWA/1072, with the area map used to determine boundaries. Each...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim allowed; registration of original plot cancelled and new titles to be issued as ordered.

Orders

  • Registration of Plot No. ISUKHA/SHISWA/577 is cancelled.
  • Two separate plots, ISUKHA/SHISWA/1072 and ISUKHA/SHISWA/1073, to be created.