[2015] KEELC 63 (KLR)

[2015] KEELC 63 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff and her two children were the absolute registered proprietors of MOIBEN/KAPSUMBERE BLOCK 2 (TACHASIS)/101, as evidenced by the title deed and prior court judgments. The defendants, having failed to enter appearance or file a defence, did not challenge the plaintiff's evidence. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEELC 63 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Clementina Jebet Barngetuny; Defendant: John Koech; Defendant: Augustine Kiptum; Defendant: James Ngetich; Defendant: David Kiptarar; Defendant: Raymond Kose; Defendant: Alice Arusei; Defendant: Daniel Chesubet; Defendant: Stephen Cheruiyot; Defendant: Alexander Chemwolo
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 182 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff. Orders of eviction and permanent injunction granted against the defendants. Costs to the plaintiff.
Judges
A Ombwayo
Legal Topics
Eviction, Permanent Injunction, Title to Land, Illegal Occupation, Registered Proprietorship
Source Language
en
Land and Property Eviction Permanent Injunction Title to Land Illegal Occupation Registered Proprietorship

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Clementina Jebet Barngetuny

Plaintiff

John Koech

Defendant

Augustine Kiptum

Defendant

James Ngetich

Defendant

David Kiptarar

Defendant

Raymond Kose

Defendant

Alice Arusei

Defendant

Daniel Chesubet

Defendant

Stephen Cheruiyot

Defendant

Alexander Chemwolo

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff and her co-registered owners are the absolute proprietors of MOIBEN/KAPSUMBERE BLOCK 2 (TACHASIS)/101.
  2. 2 Whether the defendants are in illegal occupation of the suit land.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to orders of eviction and permanent injunction against the defendants.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff and her two children were the absolute registered proprietors of MOIBEN/KAPSUMBERE BLOCK 2 (TACHASIS)/101, as evidenced by the title deed and prior court judgments. The defendants, having failed to enter appearance or file a defence, did not challenge the plaintiff's evidence. The court held that the defendants' occupation was illegal, as they had purported to purchase the land from a party who was not the registered proprietor and who had no authority to dispose of the land. The plaintiff was therefore entitled to an order of eviction and a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from any further dealings with the suit land. The court granted...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff. Orders of eviction and permanent injunction granted against the defendants. Costs to the plaintiff.

Orders

  • An order of eviction to issue against each of the defendants jointly and severally together with any person purporting to occupy the plaintiff's parcel of land known as MOIBEN/KAPSUMBERE BLOCK 2 (TACHASIS)/101.
  • An order of permanent injunction to restrain each of the defendants by themselves, their agents and or servants, and any person whatsoever purporting to act on permission of the defendants from entering into, ploughing, leasing, selling, transferring or in any other way dealing with the plaintiff's parcel of land...