[2017] KEELRC 1181 (KLR)
The court found that the pleadings in the original suit did not establish that the dispute arose from an employment relationship or contract of employment. Although the respondent was an employee of the 2nd appellant at the time of the incident, the cause of action did not revolve around the employment contract. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELRC 1181 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Clint Njoroge Kimani; Appellant: Jiangxi Zhongmei Engineering Construction Company Limited; Respondent: Stephen Muthii Kimiritu
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Appeal 12 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- appeal struck out for want of jurisdiction
- Judges
- B Ongaya
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Court, Preliminary Objection, Employment Relationship, Appeal Struck Out
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clint Njoroge Kimani
Appellant
Jiangxi Zhongmei Engineering Construction Company Limited
Appellant
Stephen Muthii Kimiritu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment and Labour Relations Court has jurisdiction to hear an appeal arising from a civil claim for damages for injuries suffered in a road traffic accident.
- 2 Whether the dispute arises from an employment relationship or contract of employment between the parties.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the pleadings in the original suit did not establish that the dispute arose from an employment relationship or contract of employment. Although the respondent was an employee of the 2nd appellant at the time of the incident, the cause of action did not revolve around the employment contract. The court held that its jurisdiction is strictly limited to employment and labour relations matters as defined by the Constitution and statute. Since the claim was for damages arising from a road traffic accident, the Employment and Labour Relations Court lacked jurisdiction. The preliminary objection was therefore upheld, and the appeal was struck out with costs to the respondent.
Court Disposition
appeal struck out for want of jurisdiction
Orders
- The preliminary objection dated 17.11.2016 is upheld.
- The appeal is struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT OF KENYA
AT NYERI
APPEAL NO. 12 OF 2016
CLINT NJOROGE KIMANI.................................1ST APPELLANT
JIANGXI ZHONGMEI ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED...........2ND APPELLANT
VERSUS
STEPHEN MUTHII KIMIRITU.................................RESPONDENT
(Before Hon. Justice Byram Ongaya on Friday, 16th June, 2017)
RULING
The memorandum of appeal was filed on 07. 11. 2016 through Wangai Nyuthe & Company Advocates. The appellants prayed for order that:
a. The appeal be allowed.
b. The ruling of the Principal Magistrate, Marsabit Law Courts, delivered on the 31. 10. 2016 in the Principal Magistrate’s Court Civil suit No. 16 of 2015, Stephen Muthii Kimiritu –Versus- Clint Njoroge Kimani & Jiangxi Zhongmei Engineering Construction Limited, against the Appellants be set aside.
c. The ex-parte interlocutory judgment on liability entered in default of appearance, the subsequent ex-parte proceedings, final judgment and decree entered on 20. 06. 2016 in Marsabit Law Courts, delivered on the 31. 10. 2016 in the Principal Magistrate’s Court Civil suit No. 16 of 2015, Stephen Muthii Kimiritu –Versus- Clint Njoroge Kimani & Jiangxi Zhongmei Engineering Construction Limited, and all consequential orders threfrom be set aside and the appellants be granted leave to defend the original suit and enter appearance and file and serve their statement of defence in the said original suit.
d. Marsabit Principal Magistrate’s Court Civil suit No. 16 of 2015, Stephen Muthii Kimiritu –Versus- Clint Njoroge Kimani & Jiangxi Zhongmei Engineering Construction Limited be referred back to Marsabit Principal Magistrate’s Court for retrial an merits afresh.
e. Costs of the appeal be awarded to the appellant.
The respondent opposed the appeal by filing the notice of preliminary objection on 10. 11. 2016 through Alfred Kitheka & Company Advocates. It was stated that the appeal herein be struck out on the following grounds:
1. That the Honourable Court does not have, under the law, the requisite jurisdiction to hear and determine the appeal herein.
2. The Court’s jurisdiction is limited to issues relating to employment and labour relations as per Article 162 (2) (a) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 and the Court cannot therefore adjudicate on other disputes other than those specified in the law.
3. That the appeal arises out of a civil claim for damages payable for injuries suffered in a road traffic accident and the same therefore falls outside the Court’s jurisdiction.
4. The matter in dispute is outside section 12 (5) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2011.
5. The appeal offends Article 162(2) of the Constitution as read with section 12(5) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2011.
The court has perused the plaint and the defence in the said Marsabit Principal Magistrate’s Court Civil suit No. 16 of 2015, Stephen Muthii Kimiritu –Versus- Clint Njoroge Kimani & Jiangxi Zhongmei Engineering Construction Limited. The pleadings do not suggest that the matters in dispute arise as a result of a contract of employment between the parties. It is the appellants’ case that the cause of action arose at a time when the respondent was an employee of the 2nd appellant but it is not said that the cause of action evolved and revolved about the contract of employment between the 2nd appellant and the respondent. As such the court returns that there is no dispute between an employer and employee or related to the employment relationship and therefore, the court lacks jurisdiction in the matter. It was not urged or suggested for the parties that the appeal could be transferred to the court with appropriate jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is amenable to being struck out with costs. While making the finding, the court has considered that the issue of jurisdiction had not been raised for the appellants before the trial court by way of a defence or otherwise. The court returns that it was misconceived for the appellants to belatedly invoke this court’s jurisdiction on appeal and seek to take the suit for retrial before the same trial court but which, following the appellants’ submissions, the trial court would have then lacked the jurisdiction.
In conclusion, the preliminary objection dated 17. 11. 2016 and filed on 18. 11. 2016 is hereby upheld and the appeal is hereby struck out and the appellants to pay the respondent’s costs of the appeal proceedings.
Signed, datedanddeliveredin court atNyerithisFriday, 16th June, 2017.
BYRAM ONGAYA
JUDGE