https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/8916
The application was struck out because the applicant had already filed a duplicate application, Miscellaneous Criminal Application No. E081 of 2026, seeking similar orders; the present application was therefore defective for duplicity.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] KEHC 8916 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Clinton Kasyoki Muli; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E082 of 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Sentence Review
- Outcome
- Application struck out
- Judges
- ["DR Kavedza"]
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Review, Duplicity of Applications, Striking Out Application
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clinton Kasyoki Muli
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Sentence Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for sentence review was competent despite an existing duplicate application
- 2 Whether the court should entertain multiple applications seeking similar relief
Ratio Decidendi
The application was struck out because the applicant had already filed a duplicate application, Miscellaneous Criminal Application No. E081 of 2026, seeking similar orders; the present application was therefore defective for duplicity.
Court Disposition
Application struck out
Orders
- This application is struck out for duplicity.
- Orders accordingly.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Muli v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E082 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 8916 (KLR) (23 June 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 8916 (KLR) Republic of Kenya In the High Court at Kibera Miscellaneous Criminal Application E082 of 2026 DR Kavedza, J June 23, 2026 Between Clinton Kasyoki Muli Applicant and Republic Respondent Ruling 1.The applicant appellant filed the present application seeking sentence review Directions were issued by this court, and the matter was set down for hearing. However, on 23rd June 2026, it was noted that the applicant had filed another duplicate application, vide Misc Criminal Application No. E081 of 2026 seeking similar orders. 2.For the foregoing reasons, this application is struck out for duplicity.Orders accordingly. RULING DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2026 ________________ D. KAVEDZAJUDGE