[2020] KEHC 7087 (KLR)
The court found that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory death sentence for murder is unconstitutional and that courts must consider mitigation. Despite the petitioner's claims of remorse and reconciliation, the court noted the severity of the crime, the lack of a prisoner's progress...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 7087 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Clinton Kiio Nzamalu; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Petition 228 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Petition for Resentencing
- Outcome
- death sentence set aside; petitioner sentenced to 40 years imprisonment from date of arrest
- Judges
- DO Ogembo
- Legal Topics
- Murder Sentencing, Constitutionality of Death Penalty, Mitigation Factors, Resentencing Guidelines
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clinton Kiio Nzamalu
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Petition for Resentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mandatory death sentence for murder is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court decision in Muruatetu.
- 2 Whether the petitioner is entitled to resentencing based on mitigation and constitutional grounds.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory death sentence for murder is unconstitutional and that courts must consider mitigation. Despite the petitioner's claims of remorse and reconciliation, the court noted the severity of the crime, the lack of a prisoner's progress report, and the petitioner's conduct after the offence. The court concluded that the crime warranted a severe sentence, set aside the death sentence, and imposed a custodial sentence of forty years from the date of arrest.
Court Disposition
death sentence set aside; petitioner sentenced to 40 years imprisonment from date of arrest
Orders
- The death sentence is set aside.
- The petitioner is sentenced to forty (40) years imprisonment from the date of arrest.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MOMBASA
PETITION NO. 228 OF 2018
CLINTON KIIO NZAMALU.......PETITIONER
AND
REPUBLIC..................................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. The Petitioner was convicted for the offence of Murder in Mombasa HCCR Case No. 21 of 2009 and was sentenced to 50 years in prison. He appealed in Criminal Appeal No. 34 of 2013. The Appeal was dismissed and the sentence of 50 years enhanced to death.
2. The Appellant has now petitioned this court for review of sentence in view of the Supreme Court declaration in Francis Kariokor Muruatetu & Another vs. Republic SCK Pet. No. 15 of 2015 [2017] eKLR.
Brief Circumstance of the offence
3. The particulars are that on 21st May, 2009 at Mikindani Estate Ruth Muthini Waita (the Deceased) left the house at about 11 a.m. telling Bernice Mwikali that she was going to meet her cousin in town. That at around 3 p.m. the Petitioner went to a kiosk where the deceased together with Bernice Mwikali regularly left house keys and collected them and proceeded to the house and shortly thereafter the deceased followed him. A neighbor testified to have heard screams and went out to check only to find the Petitioner leaving the deceased’s house with no shoes.
4. The Petitioner submitted that the Death Sentence which was commuted to life imprisonment is unconstitutional. He has now exhausted his right of appeal and approaches court to declare that the death sentence is unconstitutional and contrary to Article 50(1) and Article 25(a) of the constitution and impose an appropriate sentence upon him.
5. He further submitted that the court did not consider his mitigation as he is a first offender and has never been accused of breaking the law and at the same time he is very remorseful. The Petitioner apologized for the offence he committed as he did not intend to kill the deceased and prayed to be jailed for 20 years. He is 38 years now and has since reconciled with the family of the victim.
6. On his part Mr. Fedha, learned counsel for the State submitted that the Petitioner killed the deceased in a very savage manner, and that this action should be severely punished.
7. I have considered the Petition as well submissions of the parties. On the issue of re-sentencing. The Petitioner submitted that he has reformed however no Prisoner’s Progress Report was availed in court. This Court notes that the Petitioner actually took someone’s life and was comfortable enough to go about his duties even after the act, as he was arrested in Kibwezi doing his daily duties as a casual laborer, having killed and ran away.
8. I am satisfied that the crime committed by the Petitioner deserves a most severe sentence. To that end, I now set aside the death herein, and in place thereof I jail the Petitioner to forty (40) years from the date of arrest.
That is the Judgment of the court.
Right of appeal in 14 days.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Mombasa this 30th day of March, 2020.
E. K. O. OGOLA
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Ms. Mwangeka for DPP
Petitioner in person via video link
Mr. Kaunda Court Assistant