[2024] KEELC 1680 (KLR)
The court held that the certificate of taxation issued by the taxing officer is final and conclusive as to the amount of costs due unless it is set aside or altered by the court. Since there was no challenge or reference to the certificate of taxation and the Respondents did not contest the application, the court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELC 1680 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: CM Advocates LLP; Respondent: Nairobi City County; Respondent: Nairobi Metropolitan Services
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application E270 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Entry of Judgment on Taxed Costs
- Outcome
- judgment entered for applicant with interest and costs
- Judges
- MD Mwangi
- Legal Topics
- Advocate Client Costs, Taxation of Costs, Certificate of Taxation, Interest on Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CM Advocates LLP
Applicant
Nairobi City County
Respondent
Nairobi Metropolitan Services
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Entry of Judgment on Taxed Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should enter judgment in favour of the Advocate/Applicant for the taxed costs as per the certificate of taxation.
- 2 Whether the Advocate/Applicant is entitled to interest on the taxed costs from the date specified.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the certificate of taxation issued by the taxing officer is final and conclusive as to the amount of costs due unless it is set aside or altered by the court. Since there was no challenge or reference to the certificate of taxation and the Respondents did not contest the application, the court was obligated to enter judgment for the sum certified. Furthermore, the court found that interest on the taxed costs should accrue at the rate of 14% per annum from 5th February 2022, being 30 days after the Bill of Costs was served, in accordance with the Advocates Remuneration Order and as affirmed by the Court of Appeal in Otieno, Ragot & Company Advocates v Kenya Airports...
Court Disposition
judgment entered for applicant with interest and costs
Orders
- Judgment is entered in favour of the Advocate/Applicant against the Respondents for the sum of Kshs. 32,892,485/=.
- Interest at the rate of 14% per annum from 5th February 2022 until payment in full is awarded to the Advocate/Applicant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
CM Advocates LLP v Nairobi City County & another (Miscellaneous Application E270 of 2022) [2024] KEELC 1680 (KLR) (19 March 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 1680 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Miscellaneous Application E270 of 2022
MD Mwangi, J
March 19, 2024
Between
Cm Advocates Llp
Advocate
and
Nairobi City County
1st Client
Nairobi Metropolitan Services
2nd Client
Ruling
1. The application before me is the Advocate’s Notice of Motion application dated 11th January, 2024 seeking entry of judgement for the taxed costs of Kshs. 32,892,485/= in accordance with the certificate of taxation issued on 9th January 2024 after the taxation of the Advocate – Client bill of costs.
2. The application is premised on the grounds on the face of it and supported by the Affidavit of one Caroline Kendi Kithinji sworn on 11th January, 2024. The deponent has attached a copy of the certificate of taxation confirming the taxation of the Advocate-client costs at Kshs. 32,892,485/=.
3. Though the application was duly served on the Respondent and an affidavit of service filed, the Respondent did not file a response to the said application.
Issues for Determination 4. Having perused the Notice of Motion application together with the supporting affidavit thereof, I am of the view that the only issue for determination is whether the court should enter judgment in favour of the Advocate/Applicant as prayed.
Determination 5. Section 51 of the Advocates Act provides that:“(1)Every application for an order for the taxation of an advocate’s bill or for the delivery of such a bill and the delivering up of any deeds, documents and papers by an advocate shall be made in the matter of that advocate.(2)The certificate of the taxing officer by whom any bill has been taxed shall, unless it is set aside or altered by the Court, be final as to the amount of the costs covered thereby, and the Court may make such order in relation thereto as it thinks fit, including, in a case where the retainer is not disputed, an order that judgment be entered for the sum certified to be due with costs.”
6. It is clear from the subsection (2) that the certificate of costs once issued by the Taxing officer is final unless set a side or altered by the court.
7. In the case of Lubulellah & Associates Advocates –vs- N. K. Brothers Limited [2015] eKLR the court observed that:“The law is very clear that once a taxing master has taxed the costs, issued a Certificate of costs and there is no reference against his ruling or there has been a ruling and a determination made and not set aside and/or altered, no other action would be required from the court save to enter judgment.”
8. That being the case herein, the court enters judgement for the Advocate/Applicant against the Respondent for the sum of Kshs. 32,892,485/=.
9. The Advocate/Applicant has prayed for interest at the rate of 14% per annum from the 5th February 2022 until payment in full. The Advocate explains that the Bill of costs was served upon the Respondents on 4th January 2022. Therefore, the 30 days contemplated under paragraph 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order lapsed on 4th February 2022.
10. On the aspect of interest, this court will be guided by the court of Appeal decision in Otieno, Ragot & Company Advocates Vs Kenya Airports Authority (2021) eKLR. The Court of Appeal while considering an appeal from the decision of the High Court held that: -“As such, the rule (rule 7) deals with interest chargeable by an advocate in respect of its claim for disbursements and costs following submission of a fee note. It is patently clear from the rule that interest begins to accrue from the expiry of one month from the date of delivery of the bill or fee note. The learned judge’s reasoning that the rule does not specify the date from which time begins to run was therefore a misdirection”.
11. Accordingly, since there is no contestation that the Bill of costs was served upon the Respondents on 4th January 2022 as averred by the Advocate/Applicant, I will award the Advocate/Applicant interest at court rates as prayed for.
12. The Advocate/Applicant shall also have the costs of this Application as prayed for.
13. Consequently, judgement is entered in favour of the Advocate/Applicant against the Respondents for the sum of Kshs. 32,892,485/= with interest at the rate of 14% per annum from the 5th February 2022 until payment in full. The Advocate/Applicant shall also have the costs of this application.
It is so ordered.
RULING DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAIROBI THIS 19TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024. M.D. MWANGIJUDGEIn the virtual presence of:Mr. Gisemba for the Advocate/ApplicantN/A by the RespondentsCourt Assistant: YvetteM.D. MWANGIJUDGE