[2020] KECA 766 (KLR)
The Court found that the applicant had demonstrated an arguable appeal, as the draft memorandum of appeal was not frivolous and the respondent did not contest its arguability. On the nugatory aspect, the Court held that the large sum involved and the risk of closure, bankruptcy, and layoffs constituted potential...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KECA 766 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: CMA CGM (K) Limited; Respondent: The Commissioner of Domestic Taxes
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Application 93 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Intended Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for stay of execution granted on condition of deposit.
- Judges
- GK Oenga, F Sichale
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Withholding Tax Disputes, Appeals Process, Interim Relief
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CMA CGM (K) Limited
Applicant
The Commissioner of Domestic Taxes
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Intended Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated an arguable appeal warranting a stay of execution.
- 2 Whether the intended appeal would be rendered nugatory if stay is not granted.
- 3 Whether the High Court issued a positive order capable of being stayed.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the applicant had demonstrated an arguable appeal, as the draft memorandum of appeal was not frivolous and the respondent did not contest its arguability. On the nugatory aspect, the Court held that the large sum involved and the risk of closure, bankruptcy, and layoffs constituted potential irreparable harm to the applicant. The Court exercised its discretion to grant a conditional stay of execution, requiring the applicant to deposit Kshs. 50,000,000 in a joint interest-bearing account within 60 days, failing which execution would proceed. Costs were reserved for the intended appeal.
Court Disposition
Application for stay of execution granted on condition of deposit.
Orders
- Stay of execution of the High Court judgment and decree granted pending appeal, conditional upon the applicant depositing Kshs. 50,000,000 into a joint interest-bearing account in the names of counsel for both parties within 60 days.
- In default of deposit, execution shall issue.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
35 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT NAIROBI
(CORAM: KIAGE, GATEMBU & SICHALE JJ.A)
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 93 OF 2020
BETWEEN
CMA CGM (K) LIMITED................................................................APPLICANT
AND
THE COMMISSIONER OF DOMESTIC TAXES....................RESPONDENT
(An application for stay of execution pending the lodgment, hearing and determination of an intended appeal from the Judgment, Order and Decree of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Tuiyott, J.) dated 7thFebruary, 2020
in
H.C Income Tax Appeal No. 14 of 2017)
********************
RULING OF THE COURT
The applicant CMA CGM (K) Limited seeks as against the Commissioner of Domestic Taxes (the respondent) an order staying execution of the Judgment and decree of the High Court (Tuiyott, J.) dated 7th February, 2020 pending an intended appeal. That judgment dismissed the applicant’s appeal to that court that challenged the respondent’s assessment and demand for withholding Tax amounting to Kshs. 299,130,352. 00.
In the grounds on the face of the motion and the supporting affidavit of Joseph Mwai, its legal counsel/Manager, the applicant contends that it has an arguable appeal as discernible from its draft memorandum of appeal and that unless the orders sought are granted, the same will be rendered nugatory. Those two are the long-established principles upon the satisfaction of which this Court may intervene by way of interim relief under Rule 5(2)(b). See STANLEYKANGETHE KINYANJUI vs. TONY KETTER & 5 OTHERS[2013] eKLR.
The respondent opposed the motion by way of a replying affidavit sworn by one of its officers named Grace Ibau stating, in the main, that the High Court did not issue a positive order capable of being stayed, and that the applicant had not demonstrated how it would suffer irreparable harm if the orders sought were not granted. Moreover, the respondent is well able to refund the same or apply the same to offset any tax liability the applicant may accrue.
Given the extra-ordinary times hoisted upon the Court and country by the Covid-19 pandemic, we did not hear argument by the parties but we did carefully consider the application, the rival affidavits, the submissions by counsel for the parties and the authorities cited.
On the question of arguability of the intended appeal, we readily answer in the affirmative. All an applicant needs to show is a single bona fidepoint worthy of appellate interrogation, and it need not be one that will necessarily succeed. It is only frivolous appeals that fail to make the cut. The draft memorandum of appeal is not frivolous. It is noteworthy that the respondent’s replying affidavit did not question arguability of the intended appeal.
On whether the appeal would be rendered nugatory, even though what is involved is a sum of money, the same is by no means small. Indeed, the applicant has sworn that unless the stay is granted, it stands a real risk of being forced to close down its operations, breaching contractual obligations, staring at bankruptcy and laying off hundreds of its workers which would amount to injustice and irreparable harm to it.
It is open to us at our discretion to impose terms as we deem just for the grant of an order of stay of execution. The respondent has indeed urged us in its submissions to order, should we grant the application, that the respondent make a deposit of Kshs. 100 million.
We have considered this application and now grant the motion on condition that the applicant shall deposit the sum of Kshs. 50,000,000(Fifty Million Shillings) into a joint interest bearing account to be opened in the names of counsel on record for the parties. Such deposit shall be made within 60 (sixty) days of the date hereof, in default of which execution shall issue.
Costs of the motion shall be in the intended appeal.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 24thday of April, 2020.
P.O. KIAGE
...................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
S. GATEMBU KAIRU, FCIArb
......................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
F. SICHALE
......................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original
Signed
DEPUTY REGISTRAR