[2010] KEHC 164 (KLR)
The High Court held that it cannot transfer a suit that was filed in a court lacking pecuniary jurisdiction, as such a suit is null and void from the outset. Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act only empowers the court to transfer suits that were properly instituted in a court with jurisdiction. Since the Muranga...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 164 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Co-operative Bank of Kenya Limited; Defendant: David Wandore Mwaniki
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Case 994 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Transfer Suit
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Suits, Pecuniary Jurisdiction, Court Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Co-operative Bank of Kenya Limited
Plaintiff
David Wandore Mwaniki
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Transfer Suit
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court can transfer a suit filed in a court without pecuniary jurisdiction to another court.
- 2 Whether the Muranga Court had jurisdiction to hear the original suit.
- 3 Whether the application for transfer was properly filed in the Nairobi High Court.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court held that it cannot transfer a suit that was filed in a court lacking pecuniary jurisdiction, as such a suit is null and void from the outset. Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act only empowers the court to transfer suits that were properly instituted in a court with jurisdiction. Since the Muranga Court did not have jurisdiction over the subject matter due to the amount claimed, there was no valid suit to transfer. The application was therefore dismissed. The court also noted that the application should have been filed in the Nyeri High Court, which has supervisory jurisdiction over the Muranga Court.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application to transfer the suit is dismissed.
- No orders as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLICOF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
COMMERCIAL & TAX DIVISION – MILIMANI
MISC. CASE NO. 994 OF 2010
CO-OPERATIVE BANK OF KENYA LIMITED ....................................................................................................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
DAVID WANDORE MWANIKI .......................................................................................................................... DEFENDANT
R U L I N G
The Applicant in the Notice of Motion dated 11th October, 2010 is the Plaintiff in Muranga SRMCC No. 50 of 2008 which he seeks to have transferred from the Muranga Court to the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Milimani Commercial Courts for hearing and disposal.
The Applicant has moved the Court under Section 15, 18 b (ii) and Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act on the basis that the Muranga Court lacks pecuniary jurisdiction to determine the dispute wherein the Applicant claims a sum of Kshs. 762,481. 95 plus interest and costs, from the Defendant.
The application is supported by the affidavit of the Applicants’ Advocate sworn on 11th October, 2010. In it Counsel depones that the suit was inadvertently filed at the Muranga Court on the mistaken belief that the said Court had jurisdiction to hear and determine the same, only to be told, at the time of hearing, that the Court lacked the requisite pecuniary jurisdiction.
The power of the High Court to transfer suits under Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act has been discussed severally and rulings made thereon, following the highly persuasive Ugandan authority of GAKENYAvs. MUSIRAMO [1968] E. A. 43, where the Honourable Sir Udo Udoma C.J., following the commentary at P. 130 of MULLA’S CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE (10th Edition), on Section 24 of the Indian Code of Civil Procedure (which is identical to Section 18 of the Ugandan and Kenya Civil Procedure Acts), held as follows:
(i)Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act gives general power of transfer of all suits, which may be exercised at any stage of the proceedings even suo motu by the Court without application by any party;
(ii)An order for the transfer of a suit from one Court to another cannot be made unless the suit has been in the first instance brought to a Court which has jurisdiction to try it;
(iii)The subject matter of the application on the admission and showing of the Applicant had been instituted in a Court without jurisdiction and it was therefore incompetent for the case to be transferred to the High Court for hearing and determination.
The above holding applies squarely to the application before this Court. The suit sought to be transferred, having been filed in a Court without jurisdiction is null and void ab initio. There exists no suit for this Court to transfer to the Milimani Commercial Court and the application must fail.
Whilst dismissing the same, as I hereby do, I must mention that the application ought to have filed in the Nyeri High Court under whose supervisory jurisdiction the Muranga Court falls.
Accordingly the application dismissed with no orders as to costs.
SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 10th day of December, 2010.
M. G. MUGO
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Mr. Ataka holding brief for Mr. OnyangoFor the Plaintiff
No appearanceFor the Defendant