[2019] KEHC 1237 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant had disclosed the dismissal of the previous application for stay of execution in the supporting affidavit, negating the allegation of non-disclosure. The court further held that the application was not res judicata, as Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules expressly empowers...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 1237 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Co-operative Bank of Kenya Limited; Respondent: Jerim O. Obure
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 61 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection to Application for Stay of Execution
- Outcome
- preliminary objection dismissed
- Judges
- A Mbogholi-Msagha
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Res Judicata, Preliminary Objection, Abuse of Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Co-operative Bank of Kenya Limited
Appellant
Jerim O. Obure
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection to Application for Stay of Execution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for stay of execution is res judicata due to a similar application having been dismissed in the lower court.
- 2 Whether the appellant was guilty of non-disclosure of material facts regarding the previous application.
- 3 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain the present application for stay of execution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant had disclosed the dismissal of the previous application for stay of execution in the supporting affidavit, negating the allegation of non-disclosure. The court further held that the application was not res judicata, as Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules expressly empowers the High Court to consider such applications on their merits, even after a similar application has been dismissed in the lower court. The respondent's preliminary objection was therefore without legal basis and was dismissed with costs to the appellant. The parties were directed to take an urgent hearing date for the substantive application for stay of execution.
Court Disposition
preliminary objection dismissed
Orders
- The Notice of Preliminary Objection is dismissed with costs to the appellant.
- Parties to take an urgent hearing date for the application dated 12th June, 2019.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 61 OF 2019
CO-OPERATIVE BANK OF KENYA LIMITED...........APPELLANT/APPLICANT
VERSUS
JERIM O. OBURE..................................................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
The appellant was the defendant in the lower court in which the respondent was the plaintiff. The lower court gave judgment in favour of the respondent which aggrieved the appellant leading to the present application.
The application is by way of Notice of Motion under Sections 3 and 3 A of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 22 Rule 22 (1), Order 42 Rule 6 and Order 50 rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Rules for the substantive order that there be a stay of execution of the lower court judgment dated 11th January, 2019.
Following the judgment of the lower court, the appellant filed a memorandum of appeal dated 7th February, 2019. An application for stay of execution filed in the lower court was dismissed on 29th May, 2019. This application was filed on 14th June, 2019 and therefore was filed timeously. The application is supported by an affidavit sworn by Laurence Karanja the Head of Legal department in the appellant.
The application is opposed and the respondent has filed a Notice of Preliminary Objection to that effect. The thrust of the objection is that the application is res judicata and abuse of the court process, because it is identical word for word to the Notice of Motion in the lower court, which I have observed was dismissed. Further, the appellant is accused of non-disclosure of a material fact, that is to say, the application that was filed in the lower court. Both parties have filed submissions to address the application herein which I have noted.
The appellant cannot be accused of non-disclosure because, paragraph 10 of the supporting affidavit to the present application clearly states that the earlier application for stay of execution filed in the lower court was dismissed on 29th May, 2019 hence the filing of the present application in this court.
On the issue of whether or not the application is res judicata, I am guided by Order 42 Rule 6 (1) and (6) thereof, which clearly confers jurisdiction and power upon this court to address the present application on its merits. The concern by the respondent is not grounded on any law. What the foregoing means is that, the Notice of Preliminary Objection is not only misplaced but has contributed to the delay in addressing the real issues in question. Such practice should be deprecated.
It follows that the Notice of Preliminary Objection is dismissed with costs to the appellant. Parties shall now take an urgent hearing date for the application dated 12th June, 2019.
Dated, signed and delivered at Nairobi this 14th Day of November, 2019.
A. MBOGHOLI MSAGHA
JUDGE