[2019] KEHC 9174 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 9174 (KLR)

The court found that the appellant failed to comply with its directions to file the record of appeal and submissions within the stipulated period and was absent on the scheduled hearing date. Pursuant to Order 42 Rule 20 of the Civil Procedure Rules, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the appeal for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 9174 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Co-operative Bank of Kenya Limited; Respondent: Josphat Kirigia Aburi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 25 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Appeal Dismissal for Non Compliance
Outcome
appeal dismissed for non-compliance with court directions
Legal Topics
Appeal Dismissal, Stay of Execution, Non Compliance With Court Orders, Land Sale Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Appeal Dismissal Stay of Execution Non Compliance With Court Orders Land Sale Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Co-operative Bank of Kenya Limited

Appellant

Josphat Kirigia Aburi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Appeal Dismissal for Non Compliance

  1. 1 Whether the appellant complied with the court's directions regarding the filing of the record of appeal and submissions.
  2. 2 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for non-compliance with procedural orders.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant failed to comply with its directions to file the record of appeal and submissions within the stipulated period and was absent on the scheduled hearing date. Pursuant to Order 42 Rule 20 of the Civil Procedure Rules, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the appeal for non-compliance with procedural orders. The court emphasized the importance of expeditious disposal of appeals and adherence to court directions, holding that failure to comply justifies dismissal of the appeal. The lower court file was ordered to be remitted for execution of the original judgment.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed for non-compliance with court directions

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent.
  • The lower court file is to be severed from this file and remitted back to the Chief Magistrate's Court Meru for execution of the lower court judgment.