[2020] KEHC 9835 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 9835 (KLR)

The court found that the interim orders requiring deposit of money were made to preserve the subject matter pending the hearing and determination of the suit. Since the dispute was referred to arbitration and a final award was issued, and the application to set aside the award was dismissed, the dispute has been...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 9835 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Comroad Construction & Equipment Limited; Defendant: Iberdrola Engineering & Construction Company
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 579 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Discharge Prior Court Orders Following Arbitration Award
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
F Tuiyott
Legal Topics
Arbitration Awards, Enforcement of Awards, Discharge of Court Orders
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Alternative Dispute Resolution Arbitration Awards Enforcement of Awards Discharge of Court Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Comroad Construction & Equipment Limited

Plaintiff

Iberdrola Engineering & Construction Company

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Discharge Prior Court Orders Following Arbitration Award

  1. 1 Whether the orders made on 2nd July 2015 and issued on 9th July 2015 should be discharged following the final arbitral award.
  2. 2 Whether the dispute between the parties has been conclusively determined by arbitration.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the interim orders requiring deposit of money were made to preserve the subject matter pending the hearing and determination of the suit. Since the dispute was referred to arbitration and a final award was issued, and the application to set aside the award was dismissed, the dispute has been conclusively determined. Therefore, the purpose for which the interim orders were made no longer exists, and the orders are now spent. The application to discharge the orders is allowed with costs to the applicant.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 17th June 2019 is allowed with costs.
  • The orders made on 2nd July 2015 and issued on 9th July 2015 are discharged.