[2007] KEHC 1049 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the evidence of the single eyewitness was credible and corroborated by other circumstances, including the appellant's attempt to settle the matter. The animal was produced in court and examined by a veterinary officer, negating the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] KEHC 1049 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Cornelious Gichovi Ndati; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Embu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 78 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Conviction upheld; sentence reduced.
- Legal Topics
- Unnatural Offences, Evidence of Single Witness, Sentencing Principles, First Offender Consideration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cornelious Gichovi Ndati
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction based on a single eyewitness was sufficient in law.
- 2 Whether the failure to produce the animal as an exhibit was fatal to the prosecution case.
- 3 Whether the sentence imposed was excessive considering the appellant was a first offender.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the evidence of the single eyewitness was credible and corroborated by other circumstances, including the appellant's attempt to settle the matter. The animal was produced in court and examined by a veterinary officer, negating the appellant's claim regarding the exhibit. However, the court held that the sentence of 7 years was excessive given the appellant's status as a first offender, his ill health, and family circumstances. The sentence was therefore reduced to 3 ½ years' imprisonment.
Court Disposition
Conviction upheld; sentence reduced.
Orders
- The sentence of 7 years imprisonment is set aside.
- The appellant is sentenced to 3 ½ years imprisonment from the date of conviction.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU
Criminal Appeal 78 of 2004
CORNELIOUS GICHOVI NDATI………..…………………..…..APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC………………………………………….…………RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
This appellant was charged with committing un-natural act contrary to section 162 (b) of the Penal Code.
The particulars are stated on the charge sheet. He was convicted and sentenced to 7 years imprisonment. He has filed 3 grounds of appeal:-
1. that the Trial Magistrate did not consider that he is a first offender.
2. that the evidence of single witness not sufficient.
3. that the animal was not produced as an exhibit.
However the record shows that PW1 a veterinary officer at Siakago gave evidence and pointed to the animal which was in court as exhibit. The officer said upon examination he certified everything to be normal with the animal.
PW2 Veronica Ngari Kamami was told by one Gatama that Cornelius Gichobi had had carnal knowledge of her she-goat. It was late she examined the goat’s reproductive parts and saw it was swollen. She went to sleep. On the following day in presence of Gatune and sub-area (Michael Ngare) she asked the appellant why he was doing that unnatural act to the goat. He denied it. PW1 threatened to take appellant to police. The appellant expressed his willingness to pay anything to her. The elders decided he pays Shs.8000/=. He was unable to raise that sum. Complainant therefore escorted the appellant with the goat to police station.
The eye witness was PW3 Gatune. He described what he had seen the Appellant do. This evidence was not controverted in any way. Although it was of the only eye witness there is further evidence that afterwards the appellant sought to settle the matter by offering to pay Shs.500/=. The elders had decided that he pay Shs.8000/= to settle the matter he had no such a sum.
I find the prosecution did prove the case beyond reasonable doubt and I find no reason to interfere with conviction.
On the issue of sentence although the maximum sentence is 14 years imprisonment, I find sentence passed of 7 years is excessive in the circumstances of this case. The accused was a first offender and he said he is sickly and had 2 children.
I therefore set aside the sentence of 7 years imprisonment and substitute the same with imprisonment for 3 ½ years from the date of conviction.
Dated this 19th July, 2007.
J. N. KHAMINWA
JUDGE
19/7/2007
Khaminwa – Judge
Njue – Clerk
Mr. Kimathi
Appellant present
Read in open court.
J. N. KHAMINWA
JUDGE