[1997] KECA 242 (KLR)
The court found that the relevant delay to consider was the period after the striking out of the first appeal, which was approximately two months and not inordinate. The court accepted the applicant's argument that service of the notice of appeal could be deemed to have been effected through service of the record of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1997] KECA 242 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Corporate Insurance Company Limited; Respondent: Nyali Beach Hotel Limited
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 388 of 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application granted.
- Judges
- AM Akiwumi
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeals Process, Service of Notice, Procedural Compliance
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Corporate Insurance Company Limited
Applicant
Nyali Beach Hotel Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to file the notice of appeal and record of appeal.
- 2 Whether service of the notice of appeal was properly effected in compliance with the rules.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the relevant delay to consider was the period after the striking out of the first appeal, which was approximately two months and not inordinate. The court accepted the applicant's argument that service of the notice of appeal could be deemed to have been effected through service of the record of appeal containing the notice. The court also considered that the decretal sum was secured in a joint interest-bearing account, reducing prejudice to the respondent. Accordingly, the court exercised its discretion to grant the extension of time sought by the applicant.
Court Disposition
Application granted.
Orders
- The notice of appeal shall be filed within 7 days.
- The record of appeal already filed is deemed to have been filed within 14 days after lodging the notice of appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT NAIROBI
(CORAM: AKIWUMI, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS)
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 388 OF 1996
BETWEEN
CORPORATE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED..................APPLICANT
AND
NYALI BEACH HOTEL LIMITED............................RESPONDENT
Application for extension of time to file Notice of Appeal and memorandum of appeal in an intended appeal from judgment, decree of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Mr. Justice Githinji) dated 6th april, 1993 in H.C.C.C. NO. 5123 OF 1990 ********************
R U L I N G
The present application is for the extension of time within which to file a Notice of Appeal and the related record of appeal by the applicant whose earlier appeal had been struck out by this court on the ground that the record of appeal did not contain as mandatorily required by our rules, a certified copy of the decree involved. It is agreed by all that the ensuing new notice of appeal was lodged on 3rd December, 1996 but not served as required by rule 76 within 7 days of its lodging. Indeed according to the replying affidavit of the respondent, it has not been served on them at all. But assuming that it can be said as submitted by Mr. Kimani for the applicant that because the respondent must be deemed to have been served with the notice of appeal by dint of the respondent having been served with a new record of appeal which was made part of the present proceedings before me, and which contains a copy of the notice of appeal and obviously served on the respondent after it had been filed on 13th December, 1996, some 10 days after the lodging of the notice of appeal, that this complied with 76? I would say so.
But the present application is really for the extension of time within which to file the notice of appeal and record of appeal and the delay that is relevant to this is not what happened prior to the striking out of the first intended appeal but what happened subsequently. This delay is about 2 months which I do not think is inordinate. I also take into account that the decretal sum is in a joint interest bearing account in the names of the representatives of both parties.
I will grant the application and order that the notice of appeal be filed within 7 days and the record of appeal already filed be deemed to have been filed within 14 days after the lodging of the notice of appeal. The respondent however, will have its costs for today.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 18th day of April, 1997.
A.M. AKIWUMI
....................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original
DEPUTY REGISTRAR