[2019] KEHC 12011 (KLR)
The court found that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence is not absolute and that courts have discretion to resentence based on individual circumstances. The court considered the period already served by the petitioner, his conduct in prison,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 12011 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Cosmas Akeya Don alias Mogaka; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecution
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Petition 240 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Judgment
- Outcome
- Death sentence set aside; substituted with custodial sentences.
- Judges
- DO Ogembo
- Legal Topics
- Resentencing, Robbery With Violence, Mandatory Death Sentence, Mitigation and Aggravation, Custodial Sentence Calculation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cosmas Akeya Don alias Mogaka
Appellant
Director of Public Prosecution
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioner is entitled to resentencing following the Supreme Court decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu v. Republic.
- 2 Whether the period already served in custody should be considered in determining the appropriate sentence.
- 3 What is the appropriate sentence for the petitioner given the circumstances and mitigating factors.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence is not absolute and that courts have discretion to resentence based on individual circumstances. The court considered the period already served by the petitioner, his conduct in prison, and the principles of sentencing, including deterrence, rehabilitation, and reformation. The court also referenced comparable appellate decisions where lengthy custodial sentences were deemed sufficient retribution. Consequently, the death sentence was set aside and replaced with a determinate custodial sentence, taking into account both aggravating and mitigating factors, as...
Court Disposition
Death sentence set aside; substituted with custodial sentences.
Orders
- Death sentence on count 1 set aside and replaced with 17 years imprisonment from date of arrest.
- On counts 2, 3, and 4, petitioner sentenced to 10 years imprisonment on each count.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
33 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA
CONSTITUTIONAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS DIVISION
PETITION NO. 240 OF 2018
IN THE MATTER OF: THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA 2010 (SUPERVISORY JURISDICTION AND PROTECTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOM OF AN INDIVIDUAL) HIGH COURT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE RULES 2013
AND
IN THE MATTER: OF: ARTICLE 22(1) OF THE CONSTITUTION
AND
IN THE MATTER OF: ARTICLES 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, 48, 50, 258 AND 259 OF THE CONSTITUTION
BETWEEN
COSMAS AKEYA DON ALIAS MOGAKA.................................PETITIONER
VERSUS
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTION...............................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. The Petitioner herein seeks a resentencing pursuant to the Supreme Court decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu vs. Republic [2017] eKLR.
2. The Petitioner was tried and convicted with 4 counts of robbery with violence in Kwale Chief Magistrate Court Criminal Case No. 1111 of 2007 and sentenced to death. He had been in jail for 12 years after exhausting his Appeal processes. The Petitioner together with his accomplice engaged in a spate of violent robberies within the then Coast province while armed with a panga and a firearm. It was only following police intervention that the Petitioner and his accomplice were arrested.
3. Mr. Fedha for the prosecution prays for a deterrent sentence of 20 years including the 12 years served due to circumstances surrounding his charge.
4. The Petitioner submits that he is a first offender who has a young family to take care of and that the 12 years served are sufficient in paying the debt owed to the society and he is ready to be re-integrated back to the society
5. I have carefully considered the issue at hand. Under the proviso to section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Chapter 75 of the Laws of Kenya), this Court is entitled to take into account the period the petitioner has spent in custody in determining the sentence. I have noted that the Petitioner has been in custody for approximately 12 years since his arrest. The aim of punishment is community protection, deterrence, retribution, rehabilitation, restorative Justice and reformation.
6. His Prison’s Progress Report indicates that he has undergone basic guidance and counselling and that he is of good conduct and ought to be given a second opportunity to be a good citizen.
7. I have considered judgments of Superior Courts that are intended to ensure consistency and fairness. In the case of Robert Mutashi Auda vs. Republic, Nairobi Criminal Appeal No. 247 of 2014, the Court of Appeal held as follows…
“We also appreciate the fact that the appellant has already served 13 years in prison which in our view is sufficient retribution on his part. Taking all these issues into account, we are persuaded to interfere with the death sentence imposed on the appellant and reduce the same to the term already served. The appellant’s appeal therefore succeeds in part only as far as the sentence is concerned as the conviction remains undisturbed. We order that the appellant be set at liberty unless he is otherwise lawfully held."
8. I have carefully considered the Petition, submissions by parties and relevant judicial authorities on resentencing for similar offences. I have also considered mitigating and aggravating factors. I note that the Court of Appeal in its judgment suspend the death sentence pertaining to the three counts of robbery with violence pending the execution of the sentence in count 1 of robbery with violence.
9. In the premises, I hereby set aside the death sentence imposed on the Petitioner and in place thereof I impose a jail term of seventeen (17) years from the date of arrest on count 1.
10. On counts 2, 3, 4, I hereby sentence the Petitioner to 10 years imprisonment on each count. The sentences shall run concurrently. Right of Appeal in 14 days.
That is the Judgment of the Court.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Mombasa this 20th day of November 2019.
E. K. OGOLA
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Mr. Fedha for DPP
Petitioner in person
Mr. Kaunda Court Assistant