[2021] KEHC 5545 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 5545 (KLR)

The court found that the sentence imposed by the trial magistrate was lawful and based on a thorough presentence report. The applicant had provided false information regarding his origin, was assessed as likely to abscond, and was not recommended for a non-custodial sentence by the probation officer. There was no...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 5545 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Cosmas Onyango Odhiambo; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision E030 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Sentence Revision
Outcome
application for sentence revision dismissed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Sentence Revision, Housebreaking, Felony Conviction, Penal Code Section 322, Non Custodial Sentence, Probation Report
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentence Revision Housebreaking Felony Conviction Penal Code Section 322 Non Custodial Sentence Probation Report

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cosmas Onyango Odhiambo

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Sentence Revision

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the applicant was lawful and warranted revision.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant was eligible for a non-custodial sentence based on the probation report.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the sentence imposed by the trial magistrate was lawful and based on a thorough presentence report. The applicant had provided false information regarding his origin, was assessed as likely to abscond, and was not recommended for a non-custodial sentence by the probation officer. There was no irregularity or illegality in the conviction or sentence. Therefore, there was no basis for revision, and the application was dismissed.

Court Disposition

application for sentence revision dismissed

Orders

  • The request for sentence revision is declined and dismissed.
  • The convict to serve the sentence lawfully imposed.