[2019] KEELRC 83 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 83 (KLR)

The court declined to grant interim or conservatory orders because its jurisdiction to hear the matter was challenged by the respondent, and it would be improper to grant such orders before resolving the jurisdictional question. The court held that acting without jurisdiction would render any orders made null and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 83 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: County Assembly of Embu; Respondent: Embu County Public Service Board
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 9 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Application; Ruling on Interim Relief and Preliminary Objection
Outcome
Interim relief declined; directions issued for hearing of preliminary objection.
Judges
AN Makau
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Employment and Labour Court, Interlocutory Orders, Public Service Recruitment, County Government Procedure
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Constitutional Law Administrative Law Jurisdiction of Employment and Labour Court Interlocutory Orders Public Service Recruitment County Government Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

County Assembly of Embu

Applicant

Embu County Public Service Board

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Application; Ruling on Interim Relief and Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the Employment and Labour Relations Court has jurisdiction to grant interim relief in the face of a preliminary objection on jurisdiction.
  2. 2 Whether interlocutory or conservatory orders should be granted pending determination of jurisdiction.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant should first appeal to the Public Service Commission under Section 77(2) of the County Governments Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court declined to grant interim or conservatory orders because its jurisdiction to hear the matter was challenged by the respondent, and it would be improper to grant such orders before resolving the jurisdictional question. The court held that acting without jurisdiction would render any orders made null and void. The matter was set down for hearing on the preliminary objection regarding jurisdiction, and directions were given for the applicant to respond to the objection within 21 days.

Court Disposition

Interim relief declined; directions issued for hearing of preliminary objection.

Orders

  • No interim or conservatory orders granted at this stage.
  • The respondent's preliminary objection to be heard at Meru Law Courts on 30th January 2020.