[2025] KEHC 2639 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant was entitled to withdraw the judicial review application as the notice of withdrawal was filed and served before the respondent had formally come on record or filed any response. The court held that Order 25 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules expressly allows a party to withdraw a...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 2639 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: County Assembly of Nyamira; Respondent: Enock Okero Ogori
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyamira
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Judicial Review E005 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Ruling on Notice of Withdrawal of Application
- Outcome
- Application marked as withdrawn with no orders as to costs.
- Judges
- WA Okwany
- Legal Topics
- Withdrawal of Suit, Judicial Review Procedure, Costs Award, Forum Shopping
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
County Assembly of Nyamira
Applicant
Enock Okero Ogori
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Ruling on Notice of Withdrawal of Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was entitled to withdraw the judicial review application before the respondent formally came on record.
- 2 Whether costs should be awarded against the applicant upon withdrawal of the application.
- 3 Whether the withdrawal amounted to forum shopping.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant was entitled to withdraw the judicial review application as the notice of withdrawal was filed and served before the respondent had formally come on record or filed any response. The court held that Order 25 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules expressly allows a party to withdraw a suit before it is set down for hearing, and the applicant had complied with this requirement. The court further determined that it would be fair and just to allow the withdrawal with no orders as to costs, given the respondent's formal participation had not commenced at the time of withdrawal. Allegations of forum shopping were not substantiated to a level that would warrant a...
Court Disposition
Application marked as withdrawn with no orders as to costs.
Orders
- The judicial review application is marked as withdrawn.
- There shall be no orders as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
30 paragraphs
County Assembly of Nyamira v Ogori (Judicial Review E005 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 2639 (KLR) (6 March 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 2639 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nyamira
Judicial Review E005 of 2024
WA Okwany, J
March 6, 2025
Between
County Assembly of Nyamira
Applicant
and
Enock Okero Ogori
Respondent
Ruling
1. The Applicant filed an Application dated 3rd November 2024 seeking, inter alia, leave to apply for a Judicial Review (JR) order for certiorari to bring to this court for purposes of quashing Gazette Notice Number 14229 of 2024 and 14230 of 2024.
2. When the matter came up for directions on 7th November 2024, the Respondent was granted 14 days to file a response to the application.
3. Parties were also directed to canvass the application by way of written submissions after which the matter was listed for mention on 11th December 2024 to confirm compliance with the court’s directions.
4. The Applicant thereafter filed a Notice to withdraw the application on 29th November 2024 thereby setting the stage for the Respondent’s objection to the withdrawal that is the subject of this ruling.
5. The matter was mentioned on 10th February 2025 when Mr. Bonuke, Learned Counsel for the Respondent, informed this court that he had filed a Replying Affidavit and submissions to the JR application. He therefore opposed the Notice of Withdrawal of the JR.
6. Mr. Mokua, Learned Counsel for the Applicant cited Order 25 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) on the right to withdraw suits as long as the same has not been set down for hearing as opposed to the discontinuance of a suit under Order 55 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
7. Counsel submitted that as at 29th November 2024 when he filed the Notice of Withdrawal of Application, the Respondent’s Advocate had neither formally come on record nor filed any response. Counsel noted that the Notice of Appointment of Advocate was filed on 3rd December 2024 long after the Notice of Withdrawal had been filed. He urged the court to mark the application as withdrawn with no orders as to costs.
8. Mr. Bonuke, Advocate for the Respondent submitted that the Notice for Withdrawal should be rejected as the reasons for the withdrawal had not been disclosed.
9. He noted that the Notice of Withdrawal was filed at the same time with a similar JR Application before Kisii High Court being No. E007 of 2024 in which ex-parte orders were issued.
10. He submitted that this is a classic case of forum shopping and urged this court to punish the Applicant severely, in costs, in the event the withdrawal of suit was allowed.
11. I have carefully considered the parties rival arguments over the issue of the withdrawal of the JR Application. From the narration of the sequence of events that preceded the withdrawal of the application, it is clear that the Notice of Withdrawal was filed and served on 29th November 2024, several days before the Respondent filed the Notice of Appointment of Advocates.
12. Order 25 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules stipulates as follows: -Withdrawal by plaintiff [Order 25, Rule 1]At any time before the setting down of the suit for hearing the plaintiff may by notice in writing, which shall be served on all parties, wholly discontinue his suit against all or any of the defendants or may withdraw any part of his claim, and such discontinuance or withdrawal shall not be a defence to any subsequent action.
13. Guided by the above provisions and having noted that the Notice of Withdrawal was filed long before the Respondent filed its Notice of Appointment of Advocates and response, I find that the Applicant was well within his right to withdraw the JR Application.
14. I find that it is only fair and just to allow the withdrawal, with no orders as to costs considering that the Respondent had not formally come on record as at the time that the Notice of Withdrawal was filed.
15. It is so ordered.
RULING DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NYAMIRA VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS THIS 6TH DAY OF MARCH 2025. W. A. OKWANYJUDGE