[2023] KEHC 2163 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 2163 (KLR)

The court found that the delay by the applicant in seeking leave to appeal was not inordinate and that the reasons advanced, namely the mistaken belief regarding computation of appeal timelines, were satisfactory. The applicant, being a public body, acted promptly upon realizing the error. The court exercised its...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 2163 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: County Government of Kisumu Public Health Department; Respondent: Holy Ghost Coptic Church of Africa (Administration); Respondent: John Juma Pesa; Respondent: Director Holy Ghost Church of Africa; Respondent: Family Members/Relatives
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application 013 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application for leave to appeal out of time allowed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Out of Time Extension of Time Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

County Government of Kisumu Public Health Department

Applicant

Holy Ghost Coptic Church of Africa (Administration)

Respondent

John Juma Pesa

Respondent

Director Holy Ghost Church of Africa

Respondent

Family Members/Relatives

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal out of time from the ruling and order of the Principal Magistrate.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in filing the appeal was inordinate or excusable.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the delay by the applicant in seeking leave to appeal was not inordinate and that the reasons advanced, namely the mistaken belief regarding computation of appeal timelines, were satisfactory. The applicant, being a public body, acted promptly upon realizing the error. The court exercised its discretion to grant leave to appeal out of time, emphasizing that the interests of justice would be served by allowing the applicant to file the intended appeal. The leave was granted on condition that the petition of appeal be filed and served within fourteen days, failing which the leave would lapse.

Court Disposition

application for leave to appeal out of time allowed

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicant to file and serve a petition of appeal within fourteen (14) days from the date of this ruling.
  • In default of compliance within fourteen days, the leave granted shall lapse.