[2018] KEHC 3498 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 3498 (KLR)

The court held that judicial review is concerned with the process by which a decision is made, not with the merits of the decision itself. In this case, the applicant sought to challenge the merits of the Magistrate's decision rather than the process. Therefore, the jurisdiction of the High Court was not properly...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 3498 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: County Government of Nyandarua; Respondent: Chief Magistrate’s Court at Engineer
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyahururu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application 29 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Leave to Commence Judicial Review
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
RPV Wendoh
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Certiorari, Mandamus, Jurisdiction of High Court
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Judicial Review Certiorari Mandamus Jurisdiction of High Court

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

County Government of Nyandarua

Applicant

Chief Magistrate’s Court at Engineer

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Leave to Commence Judicial Review

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has properly invoked the jurisdiction of the High Court through judicial review proceedings.
  2. 2 Whether judicial review is the appropriate remedy to challenge the decision of the Magistrate's Court at Engineer.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that judicial review is concerned with the process by which a decision is made, not with the merits of the decision itself. In this case, the applicant sought to challenge the merits of the Magistrate's decision rather than the process. Therefore, the jurisdiction of the High Court was not properly invoked through judicial review. The appropriate course for the applicant would have been to file an appeal and, if necessary, seek a stay of execution within that appeal. As a result, the application for leave to commence judicial review proceedings was dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The Chamber Summons dated 26/6/2018 is dismissed.