[2021] KEHC 9397 (KLR)
The High Court lacks jurisdiction to hear and determine disputes concerning environmental degradation, validity of land titles, and related adjudication processes, as such matters fall squarely within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court under Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and Section...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 9397 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Crystal Charlotte Beach Resort; Respondent: Registrar of Lands, Bondo; Respondent: National Land Commission; Respondent: National Environment Management Authority; Respondent: Ministry of Environment & Forestry; Respondent: County Government of Siaya; Respondent: Hon. Attorney General
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Siaya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Constitutional Petition E001 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Directions/ruling on Jurisdiction and Transfer
- Outcome
- Matter transferred to the Environment and Land Court, Kisumu; proceedings before the High Court closed.
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Courts, Environment and Land Court Mandate, Transfer of Proceedings, Access to Justice, Statutory Duty of Care
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Crystal Charlotte Beach Resort
Applicant
Registrar of Lands, Bondo
Respondent
National Land Commission
Respondent
National Environment Management Authority
Respondent
Ministry of Environment & Forestry
Respondent
County Government of Siaya
Respondent
Hon. Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Directions/ruling on Jurisdiction and Transfer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine disputes relating to environmental degradation and validity of land titles.
- 2 Whether the matter should be transferred to the Environment and Land Court as per constitutional and statutory provisions.
- 3 Whether court fees already paid should be applied in the transferee court to ensure access to justice.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court lacks jurisdiction to hear and determine disputes concerning environmental degradation, validity of land titles, and related adjudication processes, as such matters fall squarely within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court under Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act. Article 165(5)(b) further bars the High Court from entertaining such disputes. Given the preliminary stage of the proceedings and in the interest of access to justice, the court directed that the file be transmitted to the Environment and Land Court at Kisumu for further directions, and that the court fees already paid be applied in...
Court Disposition
Matter transferred to the Environment and Land Court, Kisumu; proceedings before the High Court closed.
Orders
- The file be transmitted to the Environment and Land Court, Kisumu, for further directions.
- Court fees paid to be applied in the transferee court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
AT THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA
CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NO. E001 OF 2021
CORAM: HON. R.E. ABURILI J
IN THE MATTER OF ALLEGED CONTRAVENTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, NEGLIGENT/CARELESS BREACH OF STATUTORY DUTY OF CARE & RESPONSIBILITY AND DEPRIVATION OF PROPERTY RIGHTS CONTRARY TO THE PRINCIPLES OF LAND POLICY & OBLIGATIONS IN RESPECT OF THE ENVIRONMENT (CHAPTER 5 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA, ARTICLE 60, 67 AND 69)
CRYSTAL CHARLOTTE BEACH RESORT............................................PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE REGISTRAR OF LANDS, BONDO..........................................1ST RESPONDENT
NATIONAL LAND COMMISSION...................................................2ND RESPONDENT
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY...3RD RESPONDENT
MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT & FORESTRY...........................4TH RESPONDENT
COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF SIAYA..............................................5TH RESPONDENT
THE HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL.................................................6TH RESPONDENT
RULING OF THE COURT ON GIVING OF THE DIRECTIONS
1. This matter is due for directions on a Certificate of Urgency dated 29/1/2021. All parties except the 2nd Respondent have appeared through counsel and it is clear that the Respondents have not filed their responses to the Petition and the Notice of Motion. They therefore require time to file their respective responses.
2. However, this court has had to inquire into its jurisdiction in this matter and is of the view, expressed to the parties present, that the court that is vested with jurisdiction to hear and determine questions of environmental degradation, validity or otherwise, of titles issued to the Petitioner, the alleged flawed process of adjudication and titles issued to the Petitioner, is the Environment and Land Court as stipulated in Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution.
3. Furthermore, Article 165(5)(b) of the Constitution expressly bars this court (High Court) from hearing and determining disputes that fall within the jurisdiction or purview of the courts contemplated in Article 162(2)(a) and (b) of the Constitution.
4. Section 13(1)(2) & (7) of the Environment and Land Court confers such jurisdiction on the Environment & Land Court, and the Act provides the orders that the said court can issue which orders include- compensation, declaration, judicial review (prerogative orders, general damages among others.
5. For the above reasons, and as this matter is at its initial stage, I hereby direct that the file herein be forthwith transmitted and be placed before the Environment and Land Court, Kisumu, for further directions on the disposal of the Notice of Motion and the main Petition.
6. I further order that as the Petitioner has paid into court, court fees in the sum of Kshs. 63,280. 00, the said court fees shall be applied towards the matter once transmitted to Kisumu ELC. This is in line with Article 48 of the Constitution which clearly provides that the State shall ensure access to justice for all persons and, if any fee is required, it shall be reasonable and shall not impede access to justice. In my view, calling upon the Petitioner to pay fees afresh court fees will be impeding access to justice.
7. These proceedings and Ruling/directions to be typed forthwith and transmitted to the Deputy Registrar, Kisumu Environment and Land Court for reconstruction of the file as this court arranges to transmit the original and digital file to Kisumu ELC expeditious.
8. Mention on 10/2/2021 before Environment and Land Court Judge at Kisumu.
9. Proceedings before this court on this matter are now closed.
10. Orders accordingly.
Dated, signed and Delivered at Siaya, this 8th Day of February, 2021
R.E. ABURILI
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Mr. C.N Mutuku Advocate for the Petitioner/Applicant
Mr. Mutai Advocate for the 1st, 3rd, 4th and 6th Respondents
Ms. Maryanne Advocate for the 5th Respondent