[2021] KEHC 9397 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 9397 (KLR)

The High Court lacks jurisdiction to hear and determine disputes concerning environmental degradation, validity of land titles, and related adjudication processes, as such matters fall squarely within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court under Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and Section...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 9397 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Crystal Charlotte Beach Resort; Respondent: Registrar of Lands, Bondo; Respondent: National Land Commission; Respondent: National Environment Management Authority; Respondent: Ministry of Environment & Forestry; Respondent: County Government of Siaya; Respondent: Hon. Attorney General
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Constitutional Petition E001 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Directions/ruling on Jurisdiction and Transfer
Outcome
Matter transferred to the Environment and Land Court, Kisumu; proceedings before the High Court closed.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Courts, Environment and Land Court Mandate, Transfer of Proceedings, Access to Justice, Statutory Duty of Care
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Land and Property Environmental Law Jurisdiction of Courts Environment and Land Court Mandate Transfer of Proceedings Access to Justice Statutory Duty of Care

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Crystal Charlotte Beach Resort

Applicant

Registrar of Lands, Bondo

Respondent

National Land Commission

Respondent

National Environment Management Authority

Respondent

Ministry of Environment & Forestry

Respondent

County Government of Siaya

Respondent

Hon. Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Directions/ruling on Jurisdiction and Transfer

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine disputes relating to environmental degradation and validity of land titles.
  2. 2 Whether the matter should be transferred to the Environment and Land Court as per constitutional and statutory provisions.
  3. 3 Whether court fees already paid should be applied in the transferee court to ensure access to justice.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court lacks jurisdiction to hear and determine disputes concerning environmental degradation, validity of land titles, and related adjudication processes, as such matters fall squarely within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court under Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act. Article 165(5)(b) further bars the High Court from entertaining such disputes. Given the preliminary stage of the proceedings and in the interest of access to justice, the court directed that the file be transmitted to the Environment and Land Court at Kisumu for further directions, and that the court fees already paid be applied in...

Court Disposition

Matter transferred to the Environment and Land Court, Kisumu; proceedings before the High Court closed.

Orders

  • The file be transmitted to the Environment and Land Court, Kisumu, for further directions.
  • Court fees paid to be applied in the transferee court.