[2012] KEHC 4528 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 4528 (KLR)

The court found that the Applicant, C.W.R, had fulfilled all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act. The child, abandoned at birth and in the Applicant’s care for nearly ten years, had bonded with her and her family, and the Applicant had demonstrated the ability to provide for the child’s...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] KEHC 4528 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: C.W.R; Respondent: Baby M.W alias D.M (to be known as M.R.M)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause 51 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Outcome
application allowed; adoption order granted
Judges
D Schofield
Legal Topics
Adoption Orders, Child Welfare, Parental Rights, Legal Guardianship
Source Language
en
Family and Children Adoption Orders Child Welfare Parental Rights Legal Guardianship

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

C.W.R

Applicant

Baby M.W alias D.M (to be known as M.R.M)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Applicant meets the statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act.
  2. 2 Whether it is in the best interests of the child to grant the adoption order.
  3. 3 Whether the court should dispense with the consent of the biological parents.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Applicant, C.W.R, had fulfilled all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act. The child, abandoned at birth and in the Applicant’s care for nearly ten years, had bonded with her and her family, and the Applicant had demonstrated the ability to provide for the child’s welfare despite modest means. The court held that the best interests of the child would be served by granting the adoption, noting that the Applicant’s long-term care and the child’s integration into her family justified dispensing with the biological parents’ consent. The court further found that, although Section 158(2)(b) of the Children Act generally prohibits a sole female from...

Court Disposition

application allowed; adoption order granted

Orders

  • The Applicant, C.W.R, is authorized to adopt the child known as Baby M.W alias D.M.
  • The child shall henceforth be known as M.R.M.