[2022] KECA 365 (KLR)

[2022] KECA 365 (KLR)

The Court determined that the relevant date for lodging the notice of appeal was 30th January 2020, as evidenced by the Deputy Registrar's signature on the notice. Since the notice was served on 6th February 2020, service was effected within the 7-day period stipulated by Rule 77(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KECA 365 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Cyber Access Limited; Respondent: National Land Commission
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 15 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
SG Kairu, A Mbogholi-Msagha, P Nyamweya
Legal Topics
Notice of Appeal, Service of Process, Court of Appeal Rules, Timelines for Filing, Striking Out Applications
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Notice of Appeal Service of Process Court of Appeal Rules Timelines for Filing Striking Out Applications

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cyber Access Limited

Applicant

National Land Commission

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the notice of appeal was served within the time stipulated under Rule 77(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules.
  2. 2 Whether the notice of appeal should be struck out for alleged late service.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court determined that the relevant date for lodging the notice of appeal was 30th January 2020, as evidenced by the Deputy Registrar's signature on the notice. Since the notice was served on 6th February 2020, service was effected within the 7-day period stipulated by Rule 77(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules. The applicant's contention that service was out of time was therefore unfounded. The application to strike out the notice of appeal lacked merit and was dismissed. The Court also noted that there was no opposition from the respondent, and no costs were awarded.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application to strike out the notice of appeal is dismissed.
  • No orders as to costs.