[2016] KEHC 8518 (KLR)
The court found that the dismissal of the suit for want of prosecution was erroneous because a consent order had already determined the case and costs had been taxed. Therefore, the order made on 15th June 2015 was set aside and the suit reinstated. The court further held that since the plaintiff was not responsible...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 8518 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: CYPERR ENTERPRISES LIMITED; Defendant: NATIONAL BANK OF KENYA LIMITED
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 1615 of 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal Order
- Outcome
- Application to set aside dismissal order allowed; suit reinstated.
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Consent Orders, Taxation of Costs, Setting Aside Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CYPERR ENTERPRISES LIMITED
Plaintiff
NATIONAL BANK OF KENYA LIMITED
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the dismissal of the suit for want of prosecution was proper in light of the prior consent order and taxation of costs.
- 2 Whether the order dismissing the suit should be set aside.
- 3 Who should bear the costs of the application to set aside the dismissal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the dismissal of the suit for want of prosecution was erroneous because a consent order had already determined the case and costs had been taxed. Therefore, the order made on 15th June 2015 was set aside and the suit reinstated. The court further held that since the plaintiff was not responsible for the erroneous dismissal, it would be unjust to order the plaintiff to pay the costs of the application to set aside the dismissal. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs for the application. The court also directed that the defendant serve Hon. Cyrus Jirongo, as principal director of the plaintiff, with summons for oral examination regarding the company's assets and...
Court Disposition
Application to set aside dismissal order allowed; suit reinstated.
Orders
- The orders made on 15th June 2015 dismissing the suit are set aside forthwith.
- The suit is reinstated.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
COMMERCIAL AND ADMIRALTY DIVISION
CIVIL SUIT NO. 1615 OF 2000
CYPERR ENTERPRISES LIMITED……………………..…….PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
NATIONAL BANK OF KENYA LIMITED……….…………….DEFENDANT
RULING
On 15th June 2015 the court dismissed the plaintiff’s suit for want of prosecution.
The defendant has asked the court to set aside that order because it was made in error.
The court records show that as far back as 1st March 2010, the parties recorded a consent order, indicating that the matters in issue between them had been fully settled and compromised.
Thereafter, the defendant filed a Bill of Costs. Although the plaintiff raised an objection to the Bill of Costs, the court eventually directed that the said bill be taxed. It was on 11th July 2012 when Havelock J. gave the directions as to the taxation.
On 3rd December 2012 Hon. Dominica Nyambu, the learned Taxing Officer, delivered her Ruling on the taxation, awarding to the defendant costs assessed in the sum of Kshs. 2,966,471. 76/-.
In the light of the fact that there was already a consent order, determining the case, and also because the costs had already been taxed, I find that the court erred when it dismissed the suit on 15th June 2015.
Therefore, I do hereby order that the orders made on 15th June 2015 be set aside forthwith.
In effect, the suit is hereby reinstated.
However, as the plaintiff did not bear any responsibility for the orders made on 15th June 2015, I hold the view that it would be unfair to condemn it to pay the costs of the application dated 10th November 2015.
Each party will, therefore, pay its own costs of the application.
Having now reinstated the suit, I direct that the defendant should serve HON CYRUS JIRONGO with summons, requiring him to attend court, for purposes of being examined orally, as to the assets of his company, CYPERR ENTERPRISES LIMITED. Hon. Jirongo is to be notified that he is deemed to be the principal director of the plaintiff, and that the defendant intends to ask the court to compel him to take personal responsibility for the costs payable by his company.
If Hon. Jirongo fails to attend court on the scheduled date or if he fails to show cause why he should not be held personally responsible for the costs, the court may proceed to make appropriate orders.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this25th dayof February2016.
FRED A. OCHIENG
JUDGE
Ruling read in open court in the presence of:
No appearance for the Plaintiff
Odhiambo for the Defendant
Collins Odhiambo – Court clerk.