[2018] KEELC 3381 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 3381 (KLR)

The court found that the application for reinstatement of the suit was unopposed, as neither the Attorney General nor the interested party filed any response or submissions against it. The applicant's claim that the advocate withdrew the suit without instructions was not challenged. Given the age of the matter and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 3381 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Cyprian Kithinji Muchai; Respondent: Republic; Respondent: Imenti South District LDT; Respondent: Senior Principal Magistrate, Nkubu Law Courts
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Judicial Review Appeal 22B of 2011
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Ruling on Application for Reinstatement of Suit
Outcome
Application for reinstatement of suit allowed.
Legal Topics
Reinstatement of Suit, Withdrawal Without Instructions, Judicial Review Procedure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Reinstatement of Suit Withdrawal Without Instructions Judicial Review Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cyprian Kithinji Muchai

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Imenti South District LDT

Respondent

Senior Principal Magistrate, Nkubu Law Courts

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Ruling on Application for Reinstatement of Suit

  1. 1 Whether the suit should be reinstated after being withdrawn without instructions from the applicant.
  2. 2 Whether the application for reinstatement is unopposed and should be allowed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for reinstatement of the suit was unopposed, as neither the Attorney General nor the interested party filed any response or submissions against it. The applicant's claim that the advocate withdrew the suit without instructions was not challenged. Given the age of the matter and the lack of prosecution since 2013, the court exercised its discretion to allow the reinstatement but directed that the case be set down for hearing within 90 days to avoid further delay.

Court Disposition

Application for reinstatement of suit allowed.

Orders

  • The suit is reinstated.
  • The case shall be listed for hearing within the next 90 days.