[2018] KEELRC 1939 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 1939 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had obtained a valid judgment and taxed costs against Kenya Ports Authority, with no stay of execution in place. The respondents, as principal officers of the corporation, are under a statutory duty to satisfy the decree. The application for stay at the Court of Appeal was not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 1939 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Cyrus Maina Njoroge; Respondent: The General Manager of Kenya Ports Authority; Respondent: The Chief Accountant of Kenya Ports Authority; Respondent: The Managing Director of Kenya Ports Authority
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Application 1 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Mandamus Orders, Decree Execution, Unfair Termination, Public Officer Liability
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Civil Procedure Mandamus Orders Decree Execution Unfair Termination Public Officer Liability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cyrus Maina Njoroge

Applicant

The General Manager of Kenya Ports Authority

Respondent

The Chief Accountant of Kenya Ports Authority

Respondent

The Managing Director of Kenya Ports Authority

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an order of mandamus to compel payment of the decretal sum awarded in Cause No. 215 of 2014.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents, as principal officers of Kenya Ports Authority, are the proper parties to be compelled to satisfy the decree.
  3. 3 Whether there exists any stay of execution preventing enforcement of the judgment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had obtained a valid judgment and taxed costs against Kenya Ports Authority, with no stay of execution in place. The respondents, as principal officers of the corporation, are under a statutory duty to satisfy the decree. The application for stay at the Court of Appeal was not prosecuted, and there was no legal impediment to payment. The court was satisfied that the requirements for issuance of mandamus were met, as the applicant had a clear legal right to payment, the respondents had a corresponding duty, and there was no alternative remedy. Accordingly, the court granted an order of mandamus compelling the respondents to pay the decretal sum.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • An order of mandamus is issued compelling the respondents, jointly and severally, to pay Kshs. 6,289,223.33 due on account of Employment and Labour Relations Court Cause No. 215 of 2014.
  • No order as to costs of this judicial review application.