[2009] KECA 309 (KLR)

[2009] KECA 309 (KLR)

The Court held that since the property in question had already been sold by public auction prior to the hearing of the application, the order sought to restrain the sale was overtaken by events. The Court emphasized that it cannot grant orders in vain and that the applicant's remedy, if any, lies in the suit pending...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2009] KECA 309 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Cyrus Nyaga Kabute; Respondent: Housing Finance Co. of Kenya Ltd; Respondent: Samuel P. Gachoka
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 288 of 2007
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application / Ruling on Application for Injunction Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed with costs to the respondent
Legal Topics
Injunctive Relief, Statutory Power of Sale, Public Auction, Registered Land Act, Interlocutory Applications
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Injunctive Relief Statutory Power of Sale Public Auction Registered Land Act Interlocutory Applications

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cyrus Nyaga Kabute

Applicant

Housing Finance Co. of Kenya Ltd

Respondent

Samuel P. Gachoka

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Injunction Application / Ruling on Application for Injunction Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the court can grant an injunction to restrain the sale of property when the sale has already occurred.
  2. 2 Whether the intended appeal would be rendered nugatory if the injunction is not granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that since the property in question had already been sold by public auction prior to the hearing of the application, the order sought to restrain the sale was overtaken by events. The Court emphasized that it cannot grant orders in vain and that the applicant's remedy, if any, lies in the suit pending in the High Court seeking to set aside the sale. Consequently, the application for injunction was dismissed as the relief sought was no longer available.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs to the respondent

Orders

  • The application for injunction is dismissed.
  • Costs of the application are awarded to the respondent.