[2009] KECA 309 (KLR)
The Court held that since the property in question had already been sold by public auction prior to the hearing of the application, the order sought to restrain the sale was overtaken by events. The Court emphasized that it cannot grant orders in vain and that the applicant's remedy, if any, lies in the suit pending...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] KECA 309 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Cyrus Nyaga Kabute; Respondent: Housing Finance Co. of Kenya Ltd; Respondent: Samuel P. Gachoka
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Application 288 of 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Injunction Application / Ruling on Application for Injunction Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs to the respondent
- Legal Topics
- Injunctive Relief, Statutory Power of Sale, Public Auction, Registered Land Act, Interlocutory Applications
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cyrus Nyaga Kabute
Applicant
Housing Finance Co. of Kenya Ltd
Respondent
Samuel P. Gachoka
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application / Ruling on Application for Injunction Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court can grant an injunction to restrain the sale of property when the sale has already occurred.
- 2 Whether the intended appeal would be rendered nugatory if the injunction is not granted.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that since the property in question had already been sold by public auction prior to the hearing of the application, the order sought to restrain the sale was overtaken by events. The Court emphasized that it cannot grant orders in vain and that the applicant's remedy, if any, lies in the suit pending in the High Court seeking to set aside the sale. Consequently, the application for injunction was dismissed as the relief sought was no longer available.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs to the respondent
Orders
- The application for injunction is dismissed.
- Costs of the application are awarded to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
38 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
Civil Appli 288 of 2007
CYRUS NYAGA KABUTE ……………………………..………….. APPLICANT
AND
HOUSING FINANCE CO. OF KENYA LTD
SAMUEL P. GACHOKA …………………………………..…… RESPONDENTS
(An application for injunction pending the hearing and determination of an intended civil appeal as per the notice of appeal (Azangalala, J) dated 26th October, 2007
in
H.C.C.C. No. 159 of 2000)
******************
RULING OF THE COURT
The applicant Mr Cyrus Nyaga Kabute has filed an application dated 21st November, 2007, expressed to be grounded on rule 40(a) and (b) of this Court’s rules. The applicant is in person.
The application has sought orders as follows:-
1. )That this Honourable Court be pleased to grant a temporary injunction restraining the respondent by themselves, servants or agents from selling, disposing, alienating transferring or in any manner interfering with the applicant’s property known asParcel No. GICHUGU/SETTLEMENT/SCHEME/232situated inKirinyagapending the hearing and determination of an intended appeal as per the Notice of Appeal dated 26th October, 2007 or further orders of this Honourable Court.
2. )That costs of this application be provided for.
The applicant has in the body of the application given six grounds in support of the application, but for reasons set out hereinbelow, we shall focus on grounds (a) and (e) only.
Ground (a) states;
“That the sale notice has been given byM/s VIEWLINE AUCTIONEERSan agent for the respondent/defendant the creditor/chargee dated 26th September, 2007where the said notice stipulates that the date of sale by public auction will be held on 30th November, 2007. ”
Ground (e) states:-
“Unless an order of injunction is issued restraining sale or disposal of the said property the intended civil appeal as per the Notice of Appeal which is dated 26th October 2007 will be rendered nugatory.”
It is common ground that the applicant who is unrepresented had charged the property described in prayer (1) above, to the 1st respondent. At the hearing on 11th May 2007, the learned Counsel for the 2nd respondent Mr Z. Kimani informed the Court that the property in question was sold on 30th November, 2008 by public auction pursuant to chargee’s statutory power of sale conferred on the 1st respondent by a charge registered under the Registered Land Act (Cap 300), a fact that was admitted by the applicant. The applicant further admitted that after the said sale, he filed a suit in the High Court in Embu in which he sought an order to have the sale set aside and the said suit is still pending in the said superior court.
Ordinarily, in an application of this nature which should have been brought under Rule 5(b)(2) of this Court’s rules, (but was brought by the applicant who acts in person under rule 40), this Court considers two principles, namely, whether there is any arguable appeal, or that it is not frivolous and whether the intended appeal if successful, would be rendered nugatory if the order sought is refused. However in the special circumstances of this case, as both parties to the application have disclosed to the Court, that a public auction which was intended to be stopped by an order of injunction has already taken place, the Court is of the view that the application has been overtaken by events, and the Court cannot restrain a sale that has already taken place. In addition, it is a fundamental principle of law that a court of law never acts in vain. We decline to grant the orders sought.
It is clear to the Court that the applicant’s remedy, if any, concerning the sale, lies in the suit filed in the superior court in Embu.
In the result, and for the foregoing reasons, the application is dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 29th day of May 2009.
P.K. TUNOI
............................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
P.N. WAKI
............................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
J.G. NYAMU
............................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is atrue copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR