[2016] KEHC 7484 (KLR)
The court found that the deceased's last place of residence and the substantial portion of his estate were in Kakamega County, and that most beneficiaries also resided there. The respondent's residence in Nairobi was not sufficient to justify Nairobi as the forum. The interests of justice, convenience of the parties, and the location of the estate all pointed to Kakamega as the appropriate forum. The court also held that the question of who qualifies as a beneficiary, including the applicant's status as a widow, would be determined by the court hearing the substantive dispute. The application for transfer was therefore allowed, and the cause ordered transferred to the High Court at...
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 7484 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: D D M; Respondent: R E E
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 29 February 2016
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 1490 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Cause
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- AO Muchelule, DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Succession and Administration, Forum Conveniens, Beneficiary Determination, Intestate Estate, Transfer of Proceedings
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
D D M
Applicant
R E E
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Cause
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Succession Cause should be transferred from the High Court at Nairobi to the High Court at Kakamega for hearing and disposal.
- 2 Whether the applicant has capacity to petition for grant as a widow or beneficiary of the deceased.
- 3 What is the appropriate forum for the determination of the dispute regarding the estate of the deceased.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the deceased's last place of residence and the substantial portion of his estate were in Kakamega County, and that most beneficiaries also resided there. The respondent's residence in Nairobi was not sufficient to justify Nairobi as the forum. The interests of justice, convenience of the parties, and the location of the estate all pointed to Kakamega as the appropriate forum. The court also held that the question of who qualifies as a beneficiary, including the applicant's status as a widow, would be determined by the court hearing the substantive dispute. The application for transfer was therefore allowed, and the cause ordered transferred to the High Court at...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- This High Court Succession Cause No. [particulars withheld] of 2015 at Nairobi is transferred to the High Court at Kakamega to be consolidated with Succession Cause No. [particulars withheld] of 2015.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment