D H G R v V M V [2017] KEHC 8802 (KLR)
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 8802 (KLR)
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Court
- High Court
- Panel
- M Thande
- Case number
- Divorce Cause 66 of 2015
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- High Court
- Panel
- M Thande
- Case number
- Divorce Cause 66 of 2015
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court found that the marriage between the Petitioner and Respondent had irretrievably broken down. The evidence showed that the marriage was not consummated, the parties had separated since February 2015, and all attempts at reconciliation had failed. The Respondent's conduct, including lack of communication and affection, supported the conclusion that there was no hope for the marriage. The court applied Section 66(2) of the Marriage Act, 2014, which allows for dissolution of a civil marriage on grounds including irretrievable breakdown. As the Petitioner's testimony was uncontroverted and satisfied the statutory requirements, the court granted the decree of divorce.
Court disposition
Petition for dissolution of marriage allowed; decree nisi issued.
Orders
- The marriage between the Petitioner and Respondent solemnized on 14.6.13 is dissolved.
- Decree nisi to issue and to be made absolute within 1 month.
02
Material facts
Parties
D H G R
PetitionerV M V
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the marriage between the Petitioner and Respondent has irretrievably broken down.
- 02
Whether the grounds for dissolution of a civil marriage under Section 66(2) of the Marriage Act, 2014 have been met.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The Petitioner argued that the marriage was never consummated, the Respondent was moody, reserved, non-communicative, and showed no affection. Despite living together, the Petitioner led an isolated life and eventually moved back to her parents' home. Attempts at reconciliation failed, and the Petitioner contended that the marriage had irretrievably broken down, warranting dissolution.
- Respondent
- The Respondent did not file an appearance or any response. The matter proceeded as undefended and the Petitioner's evidence was uncontroverted.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Section 66(2), Marriage Act, 2014
A civil marriage may be dissolved if it has irretrievably broken down, as provided under Section 66(2) of the Marriage Act, 2014.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court found that the marriage between the Petitioner and Respondent had irretrievably broken down. The evidence showed that the marriage was not consummated, the parties had separated since February 2015, and all attempts at reconciliation had failed. The Respondent's conduct, including lack of communication and affection, supported the conclusion that there was no hope for the marriage. The court applied Section 66(2) of the Marriage Act, 2014, which allows for dissolution of a civil marriage on grounds including irretrievable breakdown. As the Petitioner's testimony was uncontroverted and satisfied the statutory requirements, the court granted the decree of divorce.
Obiter and limits
- This is a sad situation where a young woman gets married with every hope of a happy and blissful married life but her husband treats her with little regard.
- From the testimony of the Petitioner, it would appear that there is no hope for the marriage herein which has irretrievably broken down.
Court disposition
Petition for dissolution of marriage allowed; decree nisi issued.
- The marriage between the Petitioner and Respondent solemnized on 14.6.13 is dissolved.
- Decree nisi to issue and to be made absolute within 1 month.
Source and reliance status
High Court
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
High Court
Judgment
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA
FAMILY DIVISION
DIVORCE CAUSE NO. 66 OF 2015
D H G R ………………….…….…..…..….……......…...PETITIONER
VERSUS
V M V ……………….……..…………….......………..RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. D H G R the Petitioner herein married V M V, the Respondent herein on 14. 6.13 at the [Particulars withheld] Club.The couple was issued with marriage certificate serial number [Particulars withheld] which was produced in Court as proof of the fact of the marriage.Following the marriage, the couple resided in the Respondent’s home in Parklands, Nairobi. The marriage is not blessed with any children.
2. By an Amended Petition filed on 19. 1.17, the Petitioner seeks the dissolution of her marriage to the Respondent. Although the Respondent was served with the Petition and Notice to Appear, he failed to file appearance. The matter therefore proceeded as an undefended cause.
3. In her Petition as well as in her uncontroverted testimony before the Court, the Petitioner stated that after the marriage ceremony, she moved into the Respondent’s home in Parklands Nairobi. The marriage was however not consummated as they did not live as husband and wife. The Respondent was moody, reserved and non-communicative and kept his distance from the Petitioner. She stated that despite living with the Respondent together with his parents, hers was an isolated life. The Respondent did not show her any love or affection. As a result of the Respondent’s conduct, the Petitioner moved back to her parents’ home in February 2015. Both her parents and the Respondent’s father tried to reconcile them but without success. The marriage has irretrievably broken down and the Petitioner prays that the same be dissolved.
4. I have considered the Petition and the uncontroverted testimony of the Petitioner and it is evident that the marriage herein has irretrievably broken down. The marriage was conducted at the [Particulars withheld] Club by the Registrar of Marriages. It is therefore a civil marriage. The Marriage Act, 2014 at Section 66(2) provides for the grounds upon which a civil marriage may be dissolved. These include:
(a)adultery by the other spouse;
(b)cruelty by the other spouse;
(c)exceptional depravity by the other spouse;
(d)desertion by the other spouse for at least three years; or
(e)the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage”
5. This is a sad situation where a young woman gets marriage with every hope of a happy and blissful married life but her husband treats her with little regard. He wilfully refuses to consummate the marriage in spite of living in the same house with his wife. He remains moody and uncommunicative and keeps his distance from his wife. From the testimony of the Petitioner, it would appear that there is no hope for the marriage herein which has irretrievably broken down. The parties separated in February 2015 and have not resumed cohabitation. All attempts at reconciliation have failed.
6. In view of the foregoing, I pronounce a decree of divorce and order that the marriage between the Petitioner and the Respondentsolemnized at the [Particulars withheld] Club on 14. 6.13 be and is hereby dissolved. Decree nisi to issue and the same to be made absolute within 1 month.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED in MOMBASA this 3rd February 2017
______
M. THANDE
JUDGE
In the presence of: -
……………………………………………… for the Petitioner
…………………………………………… for the Respondent
………………………….……………..…….. Court Assistant
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.