[2014] KEHC 1327 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 1327 (KLR)

The court held that since the Certificate of Taxation dated 21st August 2014 had not been set aside, altered, or varied, and there was no pending application challenging it, judgment should be entered for the applicant for the certified sum. However, the applicant was not entitled to interest at 14% per annum from...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 1327 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: D. Njogu & Company Advocates; Respondent: Continental Credit Finance (In Liquidation); Respondent: Official Receiver & Interim Liquidator
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 178 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Outcome
Application allowed in part; judgment entered for the applicant for the certified sum; interest at court rates from 21st August 2014 until payment in full; costs awarded to the applicant.
Judges
CM Kamau
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Bill, Certificate of Taxation, Interest on Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Taxation of Costs Advocate Client Bill Certificate of Taxation Interest on Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

D. Njogu & Company Advocates

Applicant

Continental Credit Finance (In Liquidation)

Respondent

Official Receiver & Interim Liquidator

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs

  1. 1 Whether judgment should be entered for the applicant for the amount certified in the Certificate of Taxation.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to interest at 14% per annum from 30th September 2013.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that since the Certificate of Taxation dated 21st August 2014 had not been set aside, altered, or varied, and there was no pending application challenging it, judgment should be entered for the applicant for the certified sum. However, the applicant was not entitled to interest at 14% per annum from 30th September 2013 because the fee note preceding the taxation only demanded Kshs 17,052,000 and not the full taxed amount, and the applicant did not demonstrate that it had raised a claim for interest at 14% as required by Rule 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order. Interest would therefore be awarded at court rates from the date of the Certificate of Taxation until payment...

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part; judgment entered for the applicant for the certified sum; interest at court rates from 21st August 2014 until payment in full; costs awarded to the applicant.

Orders

  • Judgment is entered for the applicant as against the respondent for Kshs 45,170,408 as certified by the Deputy Registrar on 21st August 2014.
  • Interest shall be at court rates from 21st August 2014 until payment in full.