[2014] KEHC 6500 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent had wilfully deserted the petitioner since September 2008, and that the marriage had irretrievably broken down. The respondent failed to contest the petition or provide any evidence to the contrary. The court was satisfied that there was no collusion or condonation of adultery....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 6500 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: D O G; Respondent: S A O
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2014
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 90 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition allowed; marriage dissolved
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Desertion, Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
D O G
Petitioner
S A O
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent deserted the petitioner, thereby justifying dissolution of the marriage.
- 2 Whether the marriage has irretrievably broken down under the law.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent had wilfully deserted the petitioner since September 2008, and that the marriage had irretrievably broken down. The respondent failed to contest the petition or provide any evidence to the contrary. The court was satisfied that there was no collusion or condonation of adultery. Consequently, the court held that the legal requirements for dissolution of marriage on the ground of desertion had been met and granted the decree nisi, to be made absolute after thirty days.
Court Disposition
petition allowed; marriage dissolved
Orders
- The marriage celebrated between the petitioner and respondent on 29th November 2002 is dissolved.
- Decree nisi to issue forthwith and to be made absolute after thirty (30) days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment