[2007] KEHC 2164 (KLR)
The court found that the petitioner failed to prove the allegation of adultery, as no specific evidence or identification of the alleged adulterer was provided, and the statutory requirements under Section 9(1) of the Matrimonial Causes Act were not met. Regarding desertion, the court held that although the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] KEHC 2164 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: D W F; Respondent: N D F
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 54 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Dissolution of Marriage, Desertion, Adultery, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
D W F
Applicant
N D F
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioner has established grounds for dissolution of marriage based on desertion and adultery.
- 2 Whether the petition was filed after the statutory period required for desertion as a ground for divorce.
- 3 Whether the petitioner discharged the burden of proof for adultery.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the petitioner failed to prove the allegation of adultery, as no specific evidence or identification of the alleged adulterer was provided, and the statutory requirements under Section 9(1) of the Matrimonial Causes Act were not met. Regarding desertion, the court held that although the respondent may have deserted the matrimonial home, the petition was filed before the lapse of the statutory three-year period required under Section 8(1)(b) of the Matrimonial Causes Act. Consequently, the petition was premature and could not succeed. The court concluded that the petitioner had not established the grounds for dissolution of marriage as required by law and dismissed the...
Court Disposition
petition dismissed
Orders
- The petition is struck out and dismissed with no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MOMBASA
Divorce Cause 54 of 2006
D W F……………………………..PETITIONER
VERSUS
N D F ………..………………RESPONDENT
J U D G M E N T
D W F and N D F being husband and wife respectively celebrated their marriage before the Registrar’s office, coast, on the 21st day of November 2003. The husband has now taken this petition to have the marriage dissolved. The wife was served with the petition but did not bother to file an answer in reply hence the petition proceeded for hearing exparte.
When the petition came up for hearing. D W F was the only witness to testify. He produced before this court a copy of the marriage certificate to establish the fact that their marriage was solemnized on 21. 11. 2003 before the Registrar of marriages, Coast Province. The Petitioner told this court that after the celebration of their marriage they flew to Germany where they cohabited as man and wife. The Petitioner claimed that the Respondent deserted the matrimonial home and has since then failed, to communicate with him. He told this court that it is now two years since the Respondent deserted him. He alleged that the Respondent was alcoholic and unfaithful to him.
I have considered the evidence tendered by the Petitioner. It is clear from the evidence that the Petitioner wants the marriage to be dissolved on the basis that the Respondent is guilty of desertion and adultery. These grounds are also particularized in the petition. Having taken into account the evidence given, the main issue which I must determine is whether or not the Petitioner has established the allegations in support of the petition and if so whether or not he is entitled to the prayers sought.
Let me start by considering the allegation that the Respondent is guilty of adultery. The Petitioner did not state who the Respondent had extra marital affairs with. He merely stated in his petition that the Respondent had associations bordering on adultery and prostitution. The law enjoins the Petitioner under Section 9(1) of the Matrimonial Causes Act to make the adulterer a co-respondent unless he is excused by the court from so doing. It was incumbent upon the petitioner to tender cogent evidence to prove such an allegation to the standards required by law. I find that the Petitioner has failed to discharge the burden of proof in this respect.
The Petitioner has accused the Respondent for desertion. It is the evidence of the Petitioner that the Respondent deserted the Petitioner and the Matrimonial home for 2 years. This actually appears to be the main ground the Petitioner heavily relied upon to agitate for an order for the dissolution of the marriage. Under Section 8(1) (b) of th e Matrimonial Causes Act, such a ground can only be relied upon if the accused has deserted the Matrimonial home three years immediately preceding the presentation of the petition. The Petitioner celebrated the marriage on 21. 11. 2003. It is alleged the Respondent disappeared from the Matrimonial home on 10. 05. 2005. The petition was filed on 23rd November 2006. It is clear that the petition was prematurely brought before the statutory period lapsed. It means that the Petitioner could be right that the Respondent deserted the matrimonial home but the remedy is only available after the lapse of three years from the date of desertion.
In the end I regret to state that the Petitioner has failed to prove his petition. The same is ordered struck out and dismissed with no order as to costs.
Dated and delivered at Mombasa this 15th day of June 2007.
J.K. SERGON
J U D G E
In open court in the presence of Mr. Odongo h/b for Miss Okumu for the Petitioner.
N/A Respondent.