[2025] KEHC 7156 (KLR)
The High Court determined that it has jurisdiction to hear and determine matters concerning paternity and parental responsibility where the enforcement of children's rights under the Children Act is sought, particularly when paternity is denied. The court relied on Section 29(3) of the Children Act, which provides for enforcement of children's rights through the High Court, and on Article 165(3)(a) of the Constitution, which vests the High Court with jurisdiction over constitutional matters. The court also referenced case law affirming the High Court's role in paternity disputes. Consequently, the application was properly before the High Court, and directions were issued for the...
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 7156 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: DAA; Respondent: JPO
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Busia
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2025
- Case Number
- Petition E001 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Preliminary Jurisdictional Ruling
- Outcome
- The High Court affirmed its jurisdiction and directed the matter to proceed by written submissions.
- Judges
- WM Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Parental Responsibility, Paternity Disputes, Jurisdiction of High Court, Children Rights
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DAA
Applicant
JPO
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Preliminary Jurisdictional Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to determine matters of paternity and parental responsibility under the Children Act.
- 2 Whether the application was properly filed before the High Court instead of the Children Court.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court determined that it has jurisdiction to hear and determine matters concerning paternity and parental responsibility where the enforcement of children's rights under the Children Act is sought, particularly when paternity is denied. The court relied on Section 29(3) of the Children Act, which provides for enforcement of children's rights through the High Court, and on Article 165(3)(a) of the Constitution, which vests the High Court with jurisdiction over constitutional matters. The court also referenced case law affirming the High Court's role in paternity disputes. Consequently, the application was properly before the High Court, and directions were issued for the...
Court Disposition
The High Court affirmed its jurisdiction and directed the matter to proceed by written submissions.
Orders
- The Motion dated 7th May 2025 shall be canvassed by way of written submissions to be filed and exchanged within seven days.
- The matter shall be mentioned on 10th June 2025 to receive submissions and allocate a date for ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment