[2020] KECA 235 (KLR)

[2020] KECA 235 (KLR)

The Court found that although the applicant had demonstrated an arguable appeal, it failed to show that the appeal would be rendered nugatory if a stay was not granted. The Court emphasized that the order sought to be stayed was a negative order, which by law is not amenable to a stay of execution. Furthermore, the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KECA 235 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Dakawou Transporters Limited; Respondent: National Land Commission; Respondent: Chief Registrar of Lands; Respondent: The Hon. Attorney General; Respondent: Raphael Musyoki Ndeti (Suing as an Administrator of the Estate of Peter Nzuki Ndeti)
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 115 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
DK Musinga, GK Oenga, F Sichale
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Compulsory Acquisition, Title Revocation, Registration of Land, Judicial Review
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Compulsory Acquisition Title Revocation Registration of Land Judicial Review

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dakawou Transporters Limited

Applicant

National Land Commission

Respondent

Chief Registrar of Lands

Respondent

The Hon. Attorney General

Respondent

Raphael Musyoki Ndeti (Suing as an Administrator of the Estate of Peter Nzuki Ndeti)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution of the judgment and decree of the Environment and Land Court pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the impugned order is a negative order not amenable to stay.
  3. 3 Whether the application has been overtaken by events due to the issuance of a new certificate of title.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that although the applicant had demonstrated an arguable appeal, it failed to show that the appeal would be rendered nugatory if a stay was not granted. The Court emphasized that the order sought to be stayed was a negative order, which by law is not amenable to a stay of execution. Furthermore, the application was overtaken by events as the new certificate of title had already been issued to the family of Peter Nzuki Ndeti. Consequently, the application for stay was dismissed and costs awarded to the respondents.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 11th May 2020 is dismissed.
  • The applicant shall bear the costs of this application.