[2008] KEHC 1365 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had established sufficient grounds for the issuance of a warrant of arrest against the defendant, who is a foreign national, no longer resides in Kenya, and whose whereabouts are unknown. The risk of the defendant absconding or removing assets from the jurisdiction was deemed...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 1365 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Dalbit Petroleum Ltd.; Defendant: Donas Sekwekwe Kalinda
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 146 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Warrant of Arrest and Attachment Before Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted.
- Legal Topics
- Attachment Before Judgment, Security for Appearance, Foreign Defendant, Credit Facility Dispute
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dalbit Petroleum Ltd.
Plaintiff
Donas Sekwekwe Kalinda
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Warrant of Arrest and Attachment Before Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant should be arrested and brought to court to show cause why he should not furnish security for his appearance in the sum of USD 152,319.17.
- 2 Whether the defendant's assets should be attached in satisfaction of any decree that may be passed against him.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had established sufficient grounds for the issuance of a warrant of arrest against the defendant, who is a foreign national, no longer resides in Kenya, and whose whereabouts are unknown. The risk of the defendant absconding or removing assets from the jurisdiction was deemed credible, justifying the need for security for appearance and attachment before judgment. The court exercised its discretion under Order XXXVIII of the Civil Procedure Rules and Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act to grant the orders sought, subject to the defendant's right to avoid arrest by paying the claimed sum. If the defendant could not be traced, attachment of the listed...
Court Disposition
Application granted.
Orders
- Warrant of arrest to issue against the defendant to bring him to court to show cause why he should not furnish security for his appearance in the sum of USD 152,319.17.
- The defendant shall not be arrested if he pays to the officer with the warrant the sum of USD 152,319.17.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS)
Civil Case 146 of 2008\
DALBIT PETROLEUM LTD. …….....………………………. PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
DONAS SEKWEKWE KALINDA ………………………..DEFENDANT
R U L I N G
Application dated 18/3/2008 brought under Order XXXVIII, Section 3A, 62 e of Civil Procedure Act seeking orders that warrant of arrest do issue against the defendant, the defendant to be brought to court to show cause why he should not furnish security for his appearance in the sum of USD152,319. 17 and in the alternative motor vehicles listed be attached in satisfaction of decree that may be passed against him.
The grounds are set out in the application which shows that the defendant is a Rwandese and has been carrying on business with the plaintiff since 2004 as a result of which the plaintiff has granted defendant credit which now has arisen to USD152,319. 17 and that the defendant has now ceased to do business with plaintiff. The defendant does not reside in Kenya and his whereabouts is not known. It is feared the defendant may remove himself and his assets outside the jurisdiction of this court.
The application is supported by affidavit of Margaret Mbaka for plaintiff. She has exhibited Transport Agreement with defendant and also documents supporting the claim. The provisions under which the application is made provides the circumstances under which orders may be made.
(i) that the defendant with intent to delay the plaintiff or to avoid any process of court or to obstruct or delay the execution of any decree that may be passed against him has absconded or left the local limits of court.
(ii) is about to abscond from jurisdiction of court and he is about to leave Kenya under circumstances affording reasonable probability that the plaintiff will or may thereby be obstructed or delayed in execution of any decree that may be passed against him.
The court may issue a warrant of arrest of defendant and bring him to court to show cause why he should not furnish security for his appearance.
Upon hearing the submissions of counsel and upon reading the affidavit I am satisfied that the plaintiff applicants are entitled to order which I hereby grant. However the defendant shall not be arrested if he pays to the officer with the warrant the sums of USD.152,319. 17.
In the event the defendant is not traced, it is hereby ordered that his assets set out under paragraph 6 of application be attached. Orders are granted accordingly.
Costs in the cause.
DATED and DELIVERED at Nairobi this 29th day of September 2008.
JOYCE N. KHAMINWA
JUDGE