[2021] KEHC 5234 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 5234 (KLR)

The court found that the appellant had satisfied all the conditions for grant of stay of execution pending appeal as set out in Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The appellant demonstrated a likelihood of suffering substantial loss if the stay was not granted, particularly because the respondent may not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 5234 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Damaris Omwoyo; Respondent: Nancy Kemunto
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyamira
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E040 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Stay Application Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application for stay of execution pending appeal allowed with conditions.
Judges
EM Muchoki
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Security for Decretal Sum, Appeal Conditions, Order 42 Rule 6, Timeliness of Application
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Security for Decretal Sum Appeal Conditions Order 42 Rule 6 Timeliness of Application

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Damaris Omwoyo

Appellant

Nancy Kemunto

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Stay Application Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellant has satisfied the conditions for grant of stay of execution pending appeal under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant is likely to suffer substantial loss if stay is not granted.
  3. 3 Whether the application for stay was made without unreasonable delay.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant had satisfied all the conditions for grant of stay of execution pending appeal as set out in Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The appellant demonstrated a likelihood of suffering substantial loss if the stay was not granted, particularly because the respondent may not be able to refund the decretal sum should the appeal succeed. The application was made within a reasonable time, and the appellant expressed willingness to deposit security. Consequently, the court allowed the application for stay of execution on condition that the entire decretal sum be deposited in court or in an interest earning account in the joint names of the advocates...

Court Disposition

Application for stay of execution pending appeal allowed with conditions.

Orders

  • The appellant/applicant shall within twenty-one (21) days deposit the entire decretal sum either in court or in an interest earning account in the joint names of the advocates for the parties.
  • The advocate for the appellant shall within the same period file and serve the record of appeal.