[2013] KEHC 5763 (KLR)
The court found that the trial court imposed a sentence within the maximum prescribed by law for the offences charged. However, upon considering the appellant's mitigation, including his personal circumstances and the facts that only the beans were proved stolen and not the cash, the High Court exercised its...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 5763 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Dan Omondi Allogo; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 122 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- sentence reduced
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Principles, House Breaking, Stealing, Plea of Guilty
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dan Omondi Allogo
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of seven years imprisonment imposed on the appellant was excessive in the circumstances.
- 2 Whether the trial court exercised its discretion in sentencing within the bounds of the law.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the trial court imposed a sentence within the maximum prescribed by law for the offences charged. However, upon considering the appellant's mitigation, including his personal circumstances and the facts that only the beans were proved stolen and not the cash, the High Court exercised its discretion to reduce the sentence. The court held that a custodial sentence of two and a half years was appropriate in the circumstances, replacing the original seven-year sentence.
Court Disposition
sentence reduced
Orders
- The sentence of seven years imprisonment is set aside and substituted with a custodial sentence of two and a half years to run from the date of sentence at the lower court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISUMU
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 122 OF 2012
DAN OMONDI ALLOGO.................................................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC....................................................................................RESPONDENT
J U D G M E N T
(From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case number 524 of 2012 of the Principal Magistrate’s Court Bondo)
The appellant herein was charged with the offence of House breaking contrary to section 304 (1) and Stealing contrary to section 279 (b) of the penal code.
The particulars are that on the 18th day of July 2012 at Nyawita sub location in Bondo district within Siaya county broke and entered the dwelling house of Linet Adhiambo with intent to steal and did steal 32 kilograms of beans and cash money of Kshs. 13,000/= the property of Linet Adhiambo all valued at Kshs. 15,560/=.
The appellant did plead guilty and was sentenced to serve 7 years imprisonment. He has appealed against the said sentence but the grounds as per the petition of appeal dated 3rd October 2012 are purely on mitigation.
When the appeal came up for hearing the appellant readily accepted the offence. He however told the court that he felt the sentence was excessive in the circumstances. He said that he was an orphan with two children. His wife was deceased and the children were now staying with their grandmother.
The state opposed the said appeal. Mr. Sang told the court since he had readily admitted the charge under section 348 of the Criminal Procedure Code he is precluded from making further plea to this court.
The issue of sentencing though discrectional must always be done within the law. The maximum sentence prescribed by law in the circumstances obtaining herein is seven (7) years.
On this score therefore, the trial court was perfectly in order. I note from the facts as read out that what was apparently proved by the prosecution was 32 kilograms of beans and not the cash.
I have considered the mitigation herein by the appellant. Taking into totality the facts herein, I shall exercise my discretion and reduce the sentence herein from seven (7) years to two and half (2½) years custodial sentence against the appellant which shall run from the date of sentence at lower court.
Orders accordingly.
Dated, signed and delivered at Kisumu this 4th day of July, 2013.
H.K. CHEMITEI JUDGE
In the presence of:
…..................................for the state
…..........................for the appellant