[2015] KEHC 5626 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent failed to disclose all beneficiaries and did not obtain their consent, contrary to the requirements of the Law of Succession Act. The court also noted that the grant was confirmed and the entire estate property was given to the respondent without specifying the shares of other...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 5626 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Dan Ouya Kodwar; Respondent: Samwel Otieno Odwar
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Migori
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 142 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant
- Outcome
- grant revoked; fresh grant to issue; subdivisions cancelled
- Judges
- DAS Majanja
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Grant, Letters of Administration, Beneficiary Rights, Jurisdiction of Court
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dan Ouya Kodwar
Applicant
Samwel Otieno Odwar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration should be revoked for failure to disclose all beneficiaries and obtain their consent.
- 2 Whether the court had jurisdiction to issue and confirm the grant given the value of the estate.
- 3 Whether the subdivision and transfer of the estate property by the respondent was lawful.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent failed to disclose all beneficiaries and did not obtain their consent, contrary to the requirements of the Law of Succession Act. The court also noted that the grant was confirmed and the entire estate property was given to the respondent without specifying the shares of other beneficiaries, which was improper. The court held that these failures justified revocation of the grant. The court further clarified that the proper procedure required the identification and consent of all beneficiaries before confirmation and distribution of the estate. The subdivisions and transfers effected by the respondent were also set aside as they were not sanctioned by a...
Court Disposition
grant revoked; fresh grant to issue; subdivisions cancelled
Orders
- The grant of letters of administration intestate issued to the respondent on 17th January 2001 and confirmed on 3rd July 2001 is revoked.
- A fresh grant shall issue to Dan Ouya Kodwar, Samuel Otieno Odwar and Meshack Abade forthwith.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT AT MIGORI
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 142 OF 2015
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF
SOLOMON ODWAR ANYANGO (DECEASED)
BETWEEN
DAN OUYA KODWAR …................................................. APPLICANT
AND
SAMWEL OTIENO ODWAR ............... PETITIONER/ RESPONDENT
RULING
The application before the Court is one for revocation of the grant of letters of administration issued and confirmed in respect of the estate of SOLOMON ODWAR ANYANGO who died on 17th April 1985. It is not in dispute that he had three wives; Penina Atieno Odwar, Silpa Adhiambo and Jenipher Akoth who are all deceased. He was also survived by several children in each house.
The respondent, Samwel Otieno Odwar, a son of the deceased from the third house petitioned for and was issued with a grant of letters of administration intestate in Migori SPM Succession Cause No. 363 of 2000. The grant was confirmed on 3rd July 2001 and the only property of the deceased NORTH SAKWA/KADERA LWALA/455 given to him.
The applicant, a son of the deceased from the 2nd house, now seeks revocation of the grant on the ground that the petitioner failed to disclose all the survivors of the deceased’s estate and obtain their consent, that he has now transferred the property to himself and that the Court has no Jurisdiction to deal with the matter, given that the value of the land is above Kshs.100,000/-. This fact is impliedly admitted by the appellant as FORM P & A 5 states that the land is valued at Kshs. 200,000/-. He also complains that the applicant has subdivided NORTH SAKWA/KADERA LWALA/455into two portions No. 1548 and No. 1549 which he had transferred to himself.
In his replying affidavit, the respondent admits that he took out the petition and followed due process as he was nominated by the family which is a large one. He imputes bad faith on the applicant who has failed to take steps to set aside the grant after 14 years. In any case he depones that the purpose of the subdivision is to distribute the property.
What emerged from my discussions with family members present in court in a bid to resolve the matter, is that the deceased had distributed the land to his respective wives prior to his death and each of his children now occupy their respective portions. The issue as I see it is to ensure that distribution is completed with the consent of all survivors in accordance with the deceased’s expressed wishes.
Nevertheless, the jurisdiction of this Court to revoke or annul the grant is clearly set out in section 76 of the Law of Succession Act(Chapter 160 of the Laws of Kenya). Apart from the jurisdictional issue, I would add that in distribution, the Court confirming the grant is obliged to identify the share of each beneficiary before confirming the grant. The proviso to section 71 of the Law of Succession Act states that, “Provided that, in cases of intestacy, the grant of letters of administration shall not be confirmed until the court is satisfied as to the respective identities and shares of all persons beneficially entitled; and when confirmed such grant shall specify all such persons and their respective shares.” It was thus improper for the court to give the respondent the whole of the property when the other beneficiaries were entitled to specific shares.
For the reasons I have given, I therefore revoke the grant of letters of administration intestate issued to the respondent on 17th January 2001 and confirmed on 3rd July 2001 in Migori SPMCC. Succession Cause No.363 of 2000. Consequently, I make the following orders;
A fresh grant shall issue to Dan Ouya Kodwar, Samuel Otieno Odwar and Meshack Abade forthwith.
The administrators thereafter shall or any of them present an application for confirmation of grant within 30 days from the date hereof.
For the avoidance of doubt subdivisions known as NORTH SAKWA/KADERA LWALA/1548and1549 are hereby cancelled.
There shall be no order as to costs.
DATEDandDELIVEREDatMIGORIthis13th day of April 2015.
D.S. MAJANJA
JUDGE
Mr Oguttu-Mboya instructed by Oguttu-Mboya and Company Advocates for the applicant.
Respondent in person.