[2019] KEELC 2209 (KLR)
The court found that the Plaintiffs. advocate had made an honest and inadvertent mistake in diarizing the hearing date as 26th September, 2018 instead of the correct date, 27th September, 2018. The advocate had served the Defendants. advocate with a hearing notice for the wrong date and only realized the error when he attended court on 26th September, 2018. On 27th September, 2018, his representative was unable to secure an adjournment before the matter was dismissed for want of prosecution. The court held that the mistake of counsel should not be visited upon the client, especially where there is no evidence of prejudice to the other party and the Plaintiffs have demonstrated readiness...
- Citation
- [2019] KEELC 2209 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Daniel Kimanthi Mutisya; Plaintiff: Josephat Waita Mutisya (Suing on behalf and beneficiaries of the Estate of Ndunda Waita – deceased); Defendant: The Chairman; Defendant: The Secretary; Defendant: The Treasurer; Defendant: Mwea Farmers Co. Limited
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 2019
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 168 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal Order
- Outcome
- Application allowed; dismissal order set aside; suit reinstated.
- Judges
- OA Angote
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Orders, Want of Prosecution, Mistake of Counsel, Discretion of Court
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daniel Kimanthi Mutisya
Plaintiff
Josephat Waita Mutisya (Suing on behalf and beneficiaries of the Estate of Ndunda Waita – deceased)
Plaintiff
The Chairman
Defendant
The Secretary
Defendant
The Treasurer
Defendant
Mwea Farmers Co. Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should set aside the dismissal order made suo moto for want of prosecution.
- 2 Whether the mistake of counsel in diarizing the wrong hearing date is sufficient ground to reinstate the suit.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Plaintiffs. advocate had made an honest and inadvertent mistake in diarizing the hearing date as 26th September, 2018 instead of the correct date, 27th September, 2018. The advocate had served the Defendants. advocate with a hearing notice for the wrong date and only realized the error when he attended court on 26th September, 2018. On 27th September, 2018, his representative was unable to secure an adjournment before the matter was dismissed for want of prosecution. The court held that the mistake of counsel should not be visited upon the client, especially where there is no evidence of prejudice to the other party and the Plaintiffs have demonstrated readiness...
Court Disposition
Application allowed; dismissal order set aside; suit reinstated.
Orders
- The application dated 25th October, 2018 is allowed as prayed.
- The dismissal order of 27th September, 2018 is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment