[2019] KEELC 3467 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated that he was awarded half an acre of land by the Land Disputes Tribunal, the award was adopted by the court, and a decree was issued. The respondent's appeal was dismissed, and the applicant has been in occupation and has developed the land. The respondent has...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELC 3467 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Daniel M’Mutungi M’Mburugu; Respondent: Moses Mburugu M’Mburugu
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 26 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part, orders granted for a limited period.
- Legal Topics
- Land Disputes Tribunal Awards, Inhibition Orders, Stay of Proceedings, Execution Out of Time
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daniel M’Mutungi M’Mburugu
Applicant
Moses Mburugu M’Mburugu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an order of inhibition against land parcel No. NYAKI/CHUGU/385 pending determination of the application.
- 2 Whether the applicant should be granted a stay of proceedings in Meru CMCC ELC No. 70 of 2018.
- 3 Whether the applicant should be granted leave or extension of time to execute the tribunal award dated 6.7.1999 out of time.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated that he was awarded half an acre of land by the Land Disputes Tribunal, the award was adopted by the court, and a decree was issued. The respondent's appeal was dismissed, and the applicant has been in occupation and has developed the land. The respondent has refused to transfer the land and is now seeking to evict the applicant and dispose of the property. The court was satisfied that the documents presented by the applicant were authentic and that there was a risk of the subject matter being disposed of before the application could be heard inter partes. However, the court noted that the applicant failed to provide full disclosure...
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part, orders granted for a limited period.
Orders
- An order of inhibition is issued inhibiting any dealings in land parcel No. NYAKI/CHUGU/385 for 4 months.
- An order of stay is issued staying proceedings in Meru CMCC ELC No. 70 of 2018 for 4 months.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MERU
MISC APPLICATION 26 OF 2018
DANIEL M’MUTUNGI M’MBURUGU........................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
MOSES MBURUGU M’MBURUGU..........................DEFENDANT
RULING
1. By notice of motion dated 28. 9.2018, applicant is seeking the following orders:
(i) That the court be pleased to issue an order of inhibition , inhibiting any dealings in land parcel No.NYAKI/CHUGU/385 pending hearing and determination of this application inter-partes.
(ii) That the court be pleased to issue an order of stay, staying proceedings in Meru CMCC ELC No. 70 of 2018 pending hearing and determination of this application inter-partes.
(iii) That this court be pleased to grant leave and/or extend time to the applicant to execute the tribunal award dated 6. 7.1999 out of time.
2. The grounds in support of the application are:
(a) That the applicant was awarded a portion measuring half (1/2) an acre in L.R No Nyaki/Chugu/385 by the Meru Central Land Disputes Tribunal via an award dated 6. 7.1999.
(b) That the land tribunal award was reached via land Dispute case no. 40 of 1999 on 6. 7.1999.
(c) That the said award was read and adopted in open court on the 10th day of July 2002 vide Meru Chief Magistrate court L.D.T No. 40 of 1999.
(d) That a decree dated 7th March 2003 was issued confirming the said award, to enable the respondent abide by the court orders conferring half (1/2) an acre to the applicant herein.
(e) That the respondent preferred an appeal at the Provincial land disputes tribunal against the said award and the said appeal was dismissed on the 5th day of April 2002.
(f) That after the said appeal was withdrawn, the respondent herein sought and obtained land control board consent to subdivide the subject matter and caused the applicant to pay the requisite fees for the whole process an amount which the applicant paid and a mutation detailing the sub-division was drawn but the respondent has refused to transfer to the applicant his share of half (1/2) an acre from the main land.
(g) That prior to the subject matter being registered in the respondent’s names, the respondent had fraudulently and secretively caused the same to be registered in his names to the exclusion of the other family members despite the same being ancestral and family land.
(h) That the applicant and his family members have been living and have been in actual occupation of the half (1/2) an acre portion in L.R no. Nyaki/Chugu/385 where he has developed extensively and still continues to occupy the same to date.
(i) That the respondent has now embarked on evicting the applicant and his family from the subject matter and is scouting for buyers with an aim of disposing off the half (1/2) acre currently occupied by the applicant and his family and on which portion the applicant has built his home and has developed the same extensively.
3. The applicant has also filed a supporting affidavit where he reiterates the contents of the grounds in support of the application.
4. I have seen the Land Disputes Tribunal award in Land Disputes Tribunal no. 4 of 1999 as well as the court order of 10. 7.2002 in L.D.T NO. 40 of 1999. I have no reason to doubt these documents.
5. I am however at a loss as to what is before the chief Magistrate in CMCC ELC 70/2018. It was incumbent upon the applicant to give full disclosure of what is pending before the lower court. In absence of such particulars, the court allows the application in terms of prayer 2, 3 and 4 of the application whereby such orders will only remain in force for a period of 4 months only.Thereafter, this miscellaneous file is to be marked as closed.
6. Costs in the cause.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT MERU THIS DAY OF 7TH JANUARY, 2019 IN THE PRESENCE OF:-
C/A: Kananu
Munene for applicant
Applicant
HON. LUCY. N. MBUGUA
ELC JUDGE