[2017] KEHC 7145 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 7145 (KLR)

The court found that the 1st defendant was negligent in the manner of driving, as there was no evidence of any intervening factor and the facts supported the application of res ipsa loquitur. The 2nd to 5th defendants were held vicariously liable as owners and trustees of the vehicle. The plaintiff's injuries were...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 7145 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Daniel Ndungu Mwangi; Defendant: Franco Shisoka; Defendant: A.I.C. Diguna; Defendant: A.I.C. Kenya Trustee Registered; Defendant: Michael Hoerder; Defendant: David Rempel
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 1801 of 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the plaintiff against the defendants jointly and severally
Judges
A Mbogholi-Msagha
Legal Topics
Road Traffic Accidents, Negligence, Vicarious Liability, Personal Injury, Damages Assessment
Source Language
en
Tort Law Road Traffic Accidents Negligence Vicarious Liability Personal Injury Damages Assessment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daniel Ndungu Mwangi

Plaintiff

Franco Shisoka

Defendant

A.I.C. Diguna

Defendant

A.I.C. Kenya Trustee Registered

Defendant

Michael Hoerder

Defendant

David Rempel

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the 1st defendant was negligent in causing the road traffic accident.
  2. 2 Whether the other defendants are vicariously liable for the acts of the 1st defendant.
  3. 3 What quantum of damages is payable to the plaintiff for pain, suffering, and special damages.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the 1st defendant was negligent in the manner of driving, as there was no evidence of any intervening factor and the facts supported the application of res ipsa loquitur. The 2nd to 5th defendants were held vicariously liable as owners and trustees of the vehicle. The plaintiff's injuries were substantiated by medical evidence, and the quantum of damages was guided by comparable case law. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff for both general and special damages, with costs and interest awarded.

Court Disposition

judgment for the plaintiff against the defendants jointly and severally

Orders

  • The plaintiff is awarded Kshs. 1,500,000 as general damages for pain and suffering.
  • The plaintiff is awarded Kshs. 155,150 as special damages.