[2020] KEHC 1189 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 1189 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had not met the threshold for grant of leave to apply for judicial review orders because he failed to annex evidence of the decision by the 1st respondent that he sought to challenge. The court also noted that the relevant correspondence was dated more than six months prior to the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 1189 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Daniel Njiru Ngai; Respondent: National Council for Persons with Disabilities; Respondent: Kenya Revenue Authority
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E056 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave
Outcome
Interlocutory orders granted; leave to file supplementary affidavit and directions for electronic hearing issued.
Judges
P Nyamweya
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Tax Exemption, Persons With Disabilities, Leave to Apply, Certiorari, Mandamus
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Tax Law Judicial Review Tax Exemption Persons With Disabilities Leave to Apply Certiorari Mandamus

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daniel Njiru Ngai

Applicant

National Council for Persons with Disabilities

Respondent

Kenya Revenue Authority

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has met the threshold for grant of leave to apply for judicial review orders of certiorari and mandamus.
  2. 2 Whether the application for certiorari is time-barred under Order 53 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
  3. 3 Whether sufficient evidence of the impugned decision by the 1st respondent has been provided.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had not met the threshold for grant of leave to apply for judicial review orders because he failed to annex evidence of the decision by the 1st respondent that he sought to challenge. The court also noted that the relevant correspondence was dated more than six months prior to the application, raising a potential time-bar under Order 53 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Consequently, the court granted the applicant leave to file and serve a supplementary affidavit annexing evidence of the impugned decisions within fourteen days, and scheduled the substantive hearing of the application. The court further directed that all pleadings and submissions be...

Court Disposition

Interlocutory orders granted; leave to file supplementary affidavit and directions for electronic hearing issued.

Orders

  • The applicant is granted leave to file and serve a supplementary affidavit annexing evidence of the decisions by the respondents within fourteen days.
  • The Chamber Summons dated 8th July 2020 shall be heard on 16th December 2020.