[2019] KEELC 3727 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 3727 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent was not in occupation of the suit property, having allegedly been evicted in 1994, and that it would be fair and just to maintain the status quo as at the time of the lower court's judgment. The court determined that granting a stay of execution would preserve the subject matter...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 3727 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Daniel Ntoitha Mwereria; Respondent: Isaac Mukaria Mwereria
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal 9B of 2019
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Appeals Process, Status Quo Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Appeals Process Status Quo Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daniel Ntoitha Mwereria

Appellant

Isaac Mukaria Mwereria

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution of the judgment pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the appeal would be rendered nugatory if the stay is not granted.
  3. 3 Whether the status quo should be maintained pending the determination of the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent was not in occupation of the suit property, having allegedly been evicted in 1994, and that it would be fair and just to maintain the status quo as at the time of the lower court's judgment. The court determined that granting a stay of execution would preserve the subject matter of the appeal and prevent the appeal from being rendered nugatory. Accordingly, the application for stay was allowed, subject to the filing and service of the record of appeal within 60 days, failing which the appeal would stand dismissed.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • An order of stay of execution of the judgment delivered 27.12.2018 in Maua CMCC No. 204/2012 is issued for a period of 1 year.
  • The record of appeal to be filed and served within 60 days, failing which the appeal will stand dismissed.