[2020] KEELRC 1374 (KLR)

[2020] KEELRC 1374 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant's dismissal was effected verbally, without justifiable cause, and in violation of the procedural requirements of the Employment Act. The facts were materially identical to those in Cause No. 1827 of 2015, where the court had determined that such dismissal was unfair and awarded...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELRC 1374 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Daniel Nyangui Mututa; Respondent: LG Harris Company (E.A) Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1829 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the claimant
Judges
DO Ogal
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Summary Dismissal, Procedural Fairness, Compensation for Dismissal
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Summary Dismissal Procedural Fairness Compensation for Dismissal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daniel Nyangui Mututa

Claimant

LG Harris Company (E.A) Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant's dismissal was unfair and unlawful under the Employment Act.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent complied with procedural requirements in effecting the dismissal.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to compensation and other terminal dues.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant's dismissal was effected verbally, without justifiable cause, and in violation of the procedural requirements of the Employment Act. The facts were materially identical to those in Cause No. 1827 of 2015, where the court had determined that such dismissal was unfair and awarded compensation equivalent to six months' salary and one month's salary in lieu of notice. The court rejected the claim for July 2015 salary, confirming it had already been paid, and based the award on the claimant's basic salary plus house allowance, excluding overtime. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant compensation and costs, with interest accruing from the date of...

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs.126,770 as compensation and notice pay.
  • The respondent shall pay the claimant's costs of the suit.