[2015] KEHC 1567 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 1567 (KLR)

The court found that the highest bidder at the auction failed to pay the required 25% of the bid price as mandated by the auction terms and the Civil Procedure Rules. The evidence, including the letter from the auctioneers, confirmed the default. Under Order 22 rule 71, the court is empowered to order a resale of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 1567 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Daniel Ojijo Ogonda; Plaintiff: George Omondi Ogolo; Defendant: Archie Chamugwana Mgondah Viany
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 17 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application to Cancel Vesting Order and Re Auction Property
Outcome
Application granted as prayed.
Judges
SJ Chitembwe
Legal Topics
Auction Sale Failure, Vesting Orders, Property Resale, Judicial Sale Procedure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Auction Sale Failure Vesting Orders Property Resale Judicial Sale Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daniel Ojijo Ogonda

Plaintiff

George Omondi Ogolo

Plaintiff

Archie Chamugwana Mgondah Viany

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Application to Cancel Vesting Order and Re Auction Property

  1. 1 Whether the vesting order relating to Plot Number L. R. 22643 sub-division number 1796 section 111 Mainland North should be cancelled due to purchaser's default.
  2. 2 Whether the property should be re-auctioned after the highest bidder failed to pay the required 25% of the bid price.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the highest bidder at the auction failed to pay the required 25% of the bid price as mandated by the auction terms and the Civil Procedure Rules. The evidence, including the letter from the auctioneers, confirmed the default. Under Order 22 rule 71, the court is empowered to order a resale of the property in such circumstances. Consequently, the court held that the application to cancel the vesting order was merited and granted the orders sought, including the re-auction of the property.

Court Disposition

Application granted as prayed.

Orders

  • The vesting order issued in relation to Plot Number L. R. 22643 sub-division number 1796 section 111 Mainland North is cancelled.
  • The property shall be re-auctioned.