[2022] KEHC 26881 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 26881 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had sufficiently explained the delay in filing the appeal, as the delay was occasioned by the lower court registry's late supply of certified proceedings and judgment. The court noted that the stay of sentence had already been granted to enable the applicant to lodge the appeal,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 26881 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Danson Mwakoma; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Voi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E126 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Malicious Damage to Property, Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Probation Orders, Compensation Orders
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Malicious Damage to Property Leave to Appeal Out of Time Probation Orders Compensation Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Danson Mwakoma

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient explanation for the delay in filing the appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether leave to appeal out of time should be granted in the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had sufficiently explained the delay in filing the appeal, as the delay was occasioned by the lower court registry's late supply of certified proceedings and judgment. The court noted that the stay of sentence had already been granted to enable the applicant to lodge the appeal, and that the delay was neither inordinate nor attributable to the applicant's negligence. Consequently, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application for leave to appeal out of time, emphasizing the importance of access to justice and the right to appeal where administrative delays are established.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Leave to appeal out of time is granted to the applicant.
  • The applicant is granted 7 days to file the draft petition of appeal annexed to the application and to prosecute the appeal expeditiously or as directed by the trial judge.