[2021] KEELC 2947 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 2947 (KLR)

The court found that there was no evidence on record that the Plaintiff served the summons to enter appearance on the Defendants as required. The Plaintiff's advocate failed to provide an affidavit of service or otherwise clarify the issue to the court or the Defendants. The court further held that the Plaintiff did...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 2947 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Danson Ndegwa (Suing as the Chairman of Jacob Chege Drive Neighbours Association); Defendant: Raphael Anselmina Ruggieri; Defendant: Teresa Carella; Defendant: Davidina Pappalarolo (Sued as the officials of The Daughters of St. Anne)
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 949 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Land and Environment Case / Ruling on Application for Dismissal of Suit
Outcome
application allowed; suit dismissed
Judges
AK Bor
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Service of Summons, Injunctive Relief, Failure to Comply With Court Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Service of Summons Injunctive Relief Failure to Comply With Court Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Danson Ndegwa (Suing as the Chairman of Jacob Chege Drive Neighbours Association)

Plaintiff

Raphael Anselmina Ruggieri

Defendant

Teresa Carella

Defendant

Davidina Pappalarolo (Sued as the officials of The Daughters of St. Anne)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Environment Case / Ruling on Application for Dismissal of Suit

  1. 1 Whether the suit should be dismissed for want of prosecution and failure to serve summons to enter appearance.
  2. 2 Whether the Plaintiff complied with the court order to serve summons within the stipulated period.
  3. 3 Whether the suit has been overtaken by events, rendering it moot.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was no evidence on record that the Plaintiff served the summons to enter appearance on the Defendants as required. The Plaintiff's advocate failed to provide an affidavit of service or otherwise clarify the issue to the court or the Defendants. The court further held that the Plaintiff did not comply with the court order of 25/7/2018 to serve fresh summons within 30 days. Additionally, the substantive relief sought by the Plaintiff—an injunction to restrain construction of a road and school—had been overtaken by events, as both the road and school were already constructed and operational. The Plaintiff's lack of action and interest, coupled with the mootness of...

Court Disposition

application allowed; suit dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 18/9/2019 is allowed in terms of prayers 3 and 4.
  • The suit is dismissed for want of prosecution and failure to comply with court orders.